Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Comparison of the semi-solid constitutive behaviour of A356 and B206 aluminum foundry alloys

dc.contributor.authorSheykh-jaberi, F.
dc.contributor.authorCockcroft, S.L.
dc.contributor.authorMaijer, D.M.
dc.contributor.authorPhillion, A.B.
dc.contributor.departmentNoneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-15T13:25:24Z
dc.date.available2019-05-15T13:25:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe semi-solid constitutive behaviour of two commercially important aluminum foundry alloys, AA B206 and AA A356, has been quantified using a Gleeble thermo-mechanical physical simulation system. For these tests, a series of samples were extracted from a directionally-solidified wedge casting. The samples were further classified by their microstructure, average grain size of 128, 220, or 325 μm for B206, and average secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) of 43, 90, or 124 μm for A356. The results indicate that at high solid fraction, 0.95<fs<1, B206 had a higher yield stress than A356. However, at lower solid fraction, fs<0.95, A356 had the higher yield stress. In both alloys, an increase in the microstructure (grain size or SDAS), resulted in a decrease in the semi-solid ductility. The effect of microstructure on yield stress was minimal. The minimum solid fraction when the yield stress reached a very low value, known as the rigidity point, was shown to be 0.93 and 0.80 for B206 and A356, respectively. This significant difference in rigidity demonstrates the importance of the eutectic on reducing hot tearing susceptibility.en_US
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24387
dc.subjectMetal castingen_US
dc.subjectAluminum alloysen_US
dc.subjectSemisolid constitutive behaviouren_US
dc.subjectHot tearingen_US
dc.subjectMicrostructureen_US
dc.titleComparison of the semi-solid constitutive behaviour of A356 and B206 aluminum foundry alloysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018_JMPT_SheykhJaberi_etal.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: