Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/18125
Title: The effect of resistance training repetition load on muscular hypertrophy and strength in young resistance trained men
Authors: Oikawa, Sara Y
Advisor: Phillips, Stuart M
Department: Kinesiology
Keywords: Resistance exercise;Hypertrophy;Strength;Young men
Publication Date: 20-Nov-2015
Abstract: Resistance training (RT)-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy is partly responsible for the RT-induced increase in strength. Previously, we reported that exercise repetition load played a minimal role in the promotion of RT-induced gains in hypertrophy and strength gains in RT-naïve participants performing RE to volitional failure. Thus, the main aim of this study were to determine the effects of 12 weeks of RT on muscle strength and hypertrophy in a trained population. 49 resistance-trained men (mean ± SEM, 23 ± 1 years, 85.9 ± 2.2 kg, 181 ± 1 cm) were randomly allocated into a lower load-high-repetition group (HR, n=24) or a higher load-low-repetition group (LR, n=25). Repetition load was set so that volitional lifting failure was achieved within the repetition ranges of 20-25 (~35-50% of 1RM) for HR or 8-12 for LR (~70-85% of 1RM). Strength as one repetition maximum (1RM) was assessed pre and post. Changes in lean body mass (LBM), appendicular lean mass (ALM) and leg lean mass (LLM) were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). There were significant increases in strength in all exercises with no differences between groups (p > 0.05) with the exception of bench press where LR showed a greater increase in 1RM than HR (p = 0.012). Similarly, LBM, ALM, and LLM increased significantly following training in the HR group (1.0 ± 0.9kg, p < .001; 0.8 ± 1.1 kg, p < 0.05; 0.7 ± 0.9 kg, p < 0.01 respectively) and the LR group (1.6 ± 1.4 kg, p < .001; 1.0 ± 1.2 kg, p < 0.05; 0.7 ± 1.0 kg, p < 0.01 respectively) with no significant differences between groups (all p > 0.05). These data show that RE performed to volitional failure using either HR or LR induces similar adaptations strength and lean mass accrual in young resistance-trained men.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/18125
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sara Oikawa MSc Thesis Defense and SGS edits.docx
Access is allowed from: 2016-08-20
Full thesis3.69 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue