Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/18125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPhillips, Stuart M-
dc.contributor.authorOikawa, Sara Y-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-24T18:12:49Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-24T18:12:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/18125-
dc.description.abstractResistance training (RT)-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy is partly responsible for the RT-induced increase in strength. Previously, we reported that exercise repetition load played a minimal role in the promotion of RT-induced gains in hypertrophy and strength gains in RT-naïve participants performing RE to volitional failure. Thus, the main aim of this study were to determine the effects of 12 weeks of RT on muscle strength and hypertrophy in a trained population. 49 resistance-trained men (mean ± SEM, 23 ± 1 years, 85.9 ± 2.2 kg, 181 ± 1 cm) were randomly allocated into a lower load-high-repetition group (HR, n=24) or a higher load-low-repetition group (LR, n=25). Repetition load was set so that volitional lifting failure was achieved within the repetition ranges of 20-25 (~35-50% of 1RM) for HR or 8-12 for LR (~70-85% of 1RM). Strength as one repetition maximum (1RM) was assessed pre and post. Changes in lean body mass (LBM), appendicular lean mass (ALM) and leg lean mass (LLM) were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). There were significant increases in strength in all exercises with no differences between groups (p > 0.05) with the exception of bench press where LR showed a greater increase in 1RM than HR (p = 0.012). Similarly, LBM, ALM, and LLM increased significantly following training in the HR group (1.0 ± 0.9kg, p < .001; 0.8 ± 1.1 kg, p < 0.05; 0.7 ± 0.9 kg, p < 0.01 respectively) and the LR group (1.6 ± 1.4 kg, p < .001; 1.0 ± 1.2 kg, p < 0.05; 0.7 ± 1.0 kg, p < 0.01 respectively) with no significant differences between groups (all p > 0.05). These data show that RE performed to volitional failure using either HR or LR induces similar adaptations strength and lean mass accrual in young resistance-trained men.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectResistance exerciseen_US
dc.subjectHypertrophyen_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectYoung menen_US
dc.titleThe effect of resistance training repetition load on muscular hypertrophy and strength in young resistance trained menen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Kinesiologyen_US
dc.description.layabstractResistance training (RT) results in an increase in muscle growth and an increase in strength. Previously, we have shown in young untrained males, that when exercise is performed until failure, or until the weight can no longer be lifted, that gains in muscle and strength were similar with the use of either light or heavy weights. The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of 12 weeks of RT on muscle growth and strength in young men who were already regularly participating in resistance exercise when performing either lower load high repetition RT (HR) or higher load low repetition RT (LR). Maximum strength and changes in muscle mass were assessed prior to and upon completion of the training protocol. Following 12 weeks of RT both groups increased muscle mass and strength to a similar extent with the exception of bench press which increased more in the LR group.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sara Oikawa MSc Thesis Defense and SGS edits.docx
Access is allowed from: 2016-08-20
Full thesis3.69 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue