Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

A Comparison of Vibration Control Strategies for a Flexible-Link Robot Arm

dc.contributor.authorGadsden SA
dc.contributor.authorAlShabi M
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-27T20:16:05Z
dc.date.available2025-02-27T20:16:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01
dc.date.updated2025-02-27T20:16:05Z
dc.description.abstractFlexible links in a robot arm often experience unwanted vibrations at the end points typically due to elastic deflections and system disturbances. This leads to reduced endpoint positioning accuracy, as well as negatively affects the overall control performance of the robot arm. Typical control strategies introduce active damping to reduce oscillations at the robot arm end points, whereas other methods apply interaction strategies based on closed-loop inverse kinematics. Other controllers, such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) methods and the robust sliding mode controller (SMC), have also been applied to robot arms in an effort to minimize endpoint vibration. This paper studies two popular vibration control strategies found in literature, namely PID and SMC. Simulation results are generated based on applications to a flexible-link robot arm, and the results are compared and discussed.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/isma.2015.7373483
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/31230
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
dc.subject4007 Control Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject4010 Engineering Practice and Education
dc.titleA Comparison of Vibration Control Strategies for a Flexible-Link Robot Arm
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
044-gadsden_conf_044.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version