Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

A Comparison of the Concepts of Buddha-Nature and Dao-Nature of Medieval China

dc.contributor.advisorBenn, James A.
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Chih-mien Adrian
dc.contributor.departmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T15:59:43Z
dc.date.available2014-07-09T15:59:43Z
dc.date.issued2014-11
dc.description.abstractThis thesis, a comparison of the concepts of buddha-nature and dao-nature in the medieval period (from the 5th to the 10th centuries) of China, presents a historical investigation of the formation of the idea that insentient things are able to possess buddha-nature in medieval Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism. In Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism, the concept of buddha-nature was originally defined as a potential possessed by sentient beings that enabled them to achieve buddhahood. From the 6th century, the concept was reinterpreted within the Chinese Buddhist tradition so that insentient things were also able to possess buddha-nature. Recent scholarship has pointed out that the idea of insentient things having buddha-nature is a combination of Buddhist and Daoist ideas based on the concept of the all-pervading Dao found in the Zhuangzi 莊子. In this sense, buddha-nature seems to be interpreted as equivalent with the Dao of Daoism. My project suggests that the reinterpretation of buddha-nature in association with the insentient realm should be elucidated in a more nuanced way than the idea of all-pervasiveness of the Dao. A historical, doctrinal investigation of the intellectual formation of the concept of buddha-nature in Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism demonstrates a new interpretation of buddha-nature in the context of insentient things having buddha-nature. Further, through a historical investigation of intellectual exchange between Buddhism and Daoism, some evidence provided in this project illustrates that the idea of insentient things having dao-nature in Daoism was not inherited from Buddhism, but drawn from Daoist tradition. This new perspective is different from that of some contemporary scholars who have claimed that the idea of insentient things having dao-nature was borrowed from Chinese Buddhism. A chronological investigation of the discussion of nature in Chinese thought demonstrates that the idea of insentient things having buddha-nature incorporates earlier Daoist traditions found in Arcane Study.en_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.degreetypeDissertationen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/15419
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBuddha-natureen_US
dc.subjectDao-natureen_US
dc.subjectChinese Buddhismen_US
dc.subjectMahāyāna Buddhismen_US
dc.subjectMedieval Chinese Buddhismen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of the Concepts of Buddha-Nature and Dao-Nature of Medieval Chinaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chih-mien Adrian Tseng's dissertation 2014-07.pdf
Size:
2.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PhD dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: