Knowing Others: Merleau-Ponty and the Articulation of Difference
| dc.contributor.advisor | Madison, Gary B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Robertson, Mark | |
| dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-11T21:49:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-09-11T21:49:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1995-09 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis will explore three related concerns. First (Chapter 1), I discern some of the basic philosophical strategies at work in the Phenomenology of Perception. I will specifically discuss the teleological/ archaeological structure of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology and his notion of "primordial unity". Second (Chapter 2), I will show how these strategies are manifest in his discussion of the other. And third (Chapter 3), I will consider some of the consequences of Merleau-Ponty's treatment of the other. In particular, I will examine his understanding of difference and plurality. A comparison with Hegel's master/slave dialectic will highlight some possible limitations of Merleau-Ponty's argument. In short, I will answer the following questions: How is the other known, according to Merleau-Ponty, and just how other is this other? | en_US |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
| dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15884 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.subject | philosophical strategies, Phenomenology of Perception, teleological/archaeological structure of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology, consequences | en_US |
| dc.title | Knowing Others: Merleau-Ponty and the Articulation of Difference | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |