Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION IN THE JOINT-NESTING SMOOTH-BILLED ANI, CROTOPHAGA ANI

dc.contributor.advisorQuinn, James S.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorSigal Balshine, Ben Evansen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrieves, Leanne A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:18Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:18Z
dc.date.created2014-04-22en_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>I studied acoustic and visual communication in the Smooth-billed Ani, a joint-nesting, cooperatively breeding cuckoo. I describe vocal repertoire of this species using both qualitative and quantitative methods. In this first, formal description of the species’ repertoire, I provide verbal descriptions of each call type, the contexts in which each call is produced, spectrograms, and acoustic measurements for each call type. I used multivariate statistics to show that call types can be correctly classified based on acoustic measurements alone. Smooth-billed Anis are capable of complex communication, including the use of functionally referential alarms and signals of aggression that reliably predict attack. Functionally referential signals are produced in response to a specific set of stimuli and elicit predictable, appropriate responses in signal receivers, even in the absence of any other cues. I show that anis produce two distinct signal types, <em>chlurps</em> and <em>ahnee</em> <em>alarms</em>, in response to two different predator classes, aerial and terrestrial, respectively. I also show that receiver responses to playback of these alarm signals are distinct and appropriate to evade predation from aerial and terrestrial attackers. Aggressive signals should increase in aggressive contexts, predict subsequent aggression and elicit responses from signal receivers. I show that <em>hoots</em>, an acoustic signal, and throat inflation, a visual signal, both increase in aggressive contexts and reliably predict aggressive escalation in the form of direct attacks on a mount. The receiver response to <em>hoots</em> and throat inflation remains to be tested. In the synthesis, I provide suggestions for future research.</p>en_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8926en_US
dc.identifier.other10007en_US
dc.identifier.other5507620en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14099
dc.subjectaggressive signalsen_US
dc.subjectalarm signalsen_US
dc.subjectcommunicationen_US
dc.subjectcooperative breedingen_US
dc.subjectCrotophaga anien_US
dc.subjectrepertoireen_US
dc.subjectBehavior and Ethologyen_US
dc.subjectBehavior and Ethologyen_US
dc.titleACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION IN THE JOINT-NESTING SMOOTH-BILLED ANI, CROTOPHAGA ANIen_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
1.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format