Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

VASCULAR ACCESS SITE BRUISING

dc.contributor.advisorArthur, Heather M.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorBryant-Lukosius, Deniseen_US
dc.contributor.advisorStrachan, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCosman, Tammy L.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentNursingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:55:30Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:55:30Z
dc.date.created2011-11-23en_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>Introduction</p> <p>The most common complication following invasive cardiac procedures is the development of vascular access site (VAS) bruising. The extent and impact of VAS bruising is poorly understood and minimally reported in the literature. Research into this common post-procedure complication is hindered by the lack of a reliable bruise measurement tool, and the concept that VAS bruising is a minor complication. This mixed methods study examined the inter-rater reliability of two methods to measure VAS bruise size. The embedded qualitative descriptive study explored patient perceptions of VAS bruising.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants having femoral or radial artery puncture for invasive cardiac procedures were included in this study. Participants reporting VAS bruising completed self measurement of bruise size using two methods, linear measurement and planimetry. The principal investigator and research assistant completed bruise measurements at the same time, and were blinded to participant and each others’ measurements. Following bruise measurement, the principal investigator conducted semi-structured interviews on a convenience sample of participants; including both sexes, a range of ages, and bruise sizes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Measurements were completed on 40 participants with VAS bruises. Analysis of inter-rater reliability was done using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), two-way random effects model. The inter-rater reliability for both linear measurement and planimetry between all three measurers was high (.929; .914 respectively). Analysis of participant narratives uncovered three major themes concerns, impact and mediating factors, with several sub-themes.</p> <p>The findings of this study support the reliability of patient VAS bruise measurement using linear measurement and planimetry. The goals and available resources for VAS research may determine the choice of measurement approach. Qualitative descriptive results indicate that patients have concerns related to VAS bruising and that this bruising may impact activities of daily living. Future research examining VAS complications should include evaluation of VAS bruising as significant patient outcome.</p>en_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6559en_US
dc.identifier.other7557en_US
dc.identifier.other2371352en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11602
dc.subjectinter-rater reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectbruise measurementen_US
dc.subjectqualitative descriptionen_US
dc.subjectmixed methodsen_US
dc.subjectvascular access siteen_US
dc.subjectintraclass correlation coefficienten_US
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.titleVASCULAR ACCESS SITE BRUISINGen_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
7.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format