Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

The Electrodynamics of Quantum Materials: Quasicrystals, Semimetals, and Poor Metals

dc.contributor.advisorTimusk, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Nathan
dc.contributor.departmentPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T14:11:56Z
dc.date.available2019-09-10T14:11:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I examine three very different solid-state systems that are all poor conductors when compared to elemental metals. The physics of canonical metals, such as the alkali and noble metals, is well known and is usually idealized in the free-or nearly free-electron picture. Their electron band structures are characterized by parabolic-like bands that cross the Fermi energy and possibly d-bands with flatter dispersions a few eV away. These well-behaved systems lend themselves to the use of simple analytic relations. Each of the three systems that I examine here differs significantly from the nearly-free parabolic band-picture of the electronic structure and require more complex analyses. In the first system of quasicrystals and approximants, we will discover that the electrons are undergoing anomalous diffusion depending on the size and symmetry of the lattices. Of course, as is well known, the details of these atomic lattice are what determine the nature of electronic band structures and how electrons may propagate in solids. In the second system, I find great agreement between my NbAs measurements and calculations on the closely related NbP compound. Incidental to this, I find that a reading of band structures shows that claims of measuring the linear band dispersion in Weyl/Dirac semimetals are not supported by the experimental and theoretical band structures. Finally, in the metallic regime of Nd_(1−x)TiO_3, we find that the Fermi liquid b coefficient is not within the bounds allowed by present models in samples with x = 0.2 and x = 0.15. It is suggested that the approximations used in current models may be why theory and experiment disagree.en_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24782
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectphysicsen_US
dc.subjectquantum materialsen_US
dc.subjectoptical spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectsolid-state physicsen_US
dc.subjectcondensed-matter physicsen_US
dc.subjectquasicrystalen_US
dc.subjectDirac/Weyl semimetalen_US
dc.subjectpoor metalen_US
dc.titleThe Electrodynamics of Quantum Materials: Quasicrystals, Semimetals, and Poor Metalsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Armstrong_Nathan_2019Aug_PhD.pdf
Size:
2.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: