Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Systematic Review: Efficacy of Medical Therapy on Outcomes Important to Adult Patients with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia

dc.contributor.authorAli, Dalal S.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T16:00:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T16:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-10
dc.descriptionUploading the supplementary tables associated with this publication to be stored in MacSphere and will be cited in the paper.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine the highest certainty evidence addressing the management of X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in adults to inform treatment recommendations. Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central up to May 2023. Eligible studies included RCTs and observational studies of individuals 18+ with clinically or genetically confirmed XLH. Manuscripts comparing burosumab to no treatment or conventional therapy (phosphate and active vitamin D) and conventional therapy to no treatment were included. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB). GRADE methodology was used to assess evidence certainty. Results: We screened 4,114 records, after removing duplicates, and assessed 254 full texts. One RCT and two observational studies were eligible. The RCT of burosumab versus no treatment had low RoB. Burosumab probably improves pain from fracture/pseudofracture healing (moderate certainty) but has little or no impact on direct pain measures (moderate certainty). Burosumab may reduce the need for parathyroidectomy (low certainty) but has little or no impact on fatigue (high certainty), stiffness (moderate certainty), and mobility (low certainty) over 24 weeks. Burosumab may increase dental abscess risk (low certainty). Indirect evidence comparing burosumab to conventional therapy provided low certainty regarding burosumab versus conventional therapy. Two observational studies on conventional therapy versus no treatment had high RoB and very low certainty regarding the impact of conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes. Conclusion: No formal comparisons between burosumab and conventional therapy in adults exist. Evidence for conventional therapy versus no treatment is very uncertain. Our review highlights the need for more data on the long-term effects of burosumab and conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes in adult patients with XLH.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCalcium Disorders Clinicen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30428
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolismen_US
dc.subjectadult XLH, efficacy,burosumab, conventional therapy, patient-important outcomesen_US
dc.titleSystematic Review: Efficacy of Medical Therapy on Outcomes Important to Adult Patients with X-Linked Hypophosphatemiaen_US
dc.typePreprinten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supplementary Material for Peer Review.docx
Size:
40.7 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: