Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Investigating the validity of implicit measures of empathy in a racial intergroup context

dc.contributor.advisorObhi, Sukhvinder
dc.contributor.advisorMilliken, Robert Bruce
dc.contributor.authorLeid-Bailey, Jaelon
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T20:54:50Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T20:54:50Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I examine implicit measures of empathy towards members of both the racial in-group and racial out-group. In study 1, McMaster students completed the Intergroup Emotional Go/No-Go Task to measure affective empathy towards racial in-group and racial out-group faces. Although, there was a significant effect of emotion, there was no significant effect of racial group suggesting that participants either showed similar levels of affective empathy towards both racial in-group and racial out-group members, or the Intergroup Emotional Go/NoGo task was not sensitive enough to detect the intergroup effect on affective empathy. In study 2, McMaster students completed the Intergroup Empathy Selection Task to measure motivation to engage in cognitive empathy towards both racial in-group and racial out-group faces. White participants were equally likely to empathize with faces that resembled their racial out-group compared to their racial in-group. However, Asian participants were significantly more likely to empathize with faces that resembled their racial in-group than their racial out-group. These findings provide insight into potential implicit measures of both affective and cognitive empathy, as well as reinforce our current understanding of how intergroup dynamics effect empathy.en_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.layabstractResearch currently measures empathy using self-report methods in which we rely on the participant to accurately judge their ability to empathize. Unfortunately, there are social factors that affect one's own evaluation of themself. For example, one may want to appear socially desirable and therefore, will exaggerate their ability to empathize to appear as a, "good person." Non-self-report measures of empathy are a possible solution, however, such methods require further research to determine if they are accurate measures of empathy. In this thesis, I examine two non-self-report measures of empathy: "The Emotional Go/NoGo Task, and, "The Empathy Selection Task," which are tasks where the participant is required to respond to an emotional face (target). Generally, we have more empathy for those of our own race than for those of another race. One step in determining the accuracy of these non-self-report measures of empathy, is to see if they can measure this difference in empathy based on the race of the target. "The Emotional Go/NoGo Task," did not show this difference, but, "The Empathy Selection Task," did show this difference.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/31059
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEmpathyen_US
dc.subjectMeasuresen_US
dc.subjectImpliciten_US
dc.subjectRaceen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the validity of implicit measures of empathy in a racial intergroup contexten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
leidbailey_jaelon_sa_202411_msc.pdf
Size:
1.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: