Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Samuel Beckett's Work in Regress: A study of the Fiction to 1953

dc.contributor.advisorAdamson, Josephen_US
dc.contributor.authorVandervlist, Harry A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglishen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:36Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:36Z
dc.date.created2014-05-23en_US
dc.date.issued1991-11en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>This study shows how the narrative strategies of Beckett's early fiction, developed as a dialogical response to Joyce's work, lead to an implied critique of conventional notions of narrative and subjectivity. Beckett's work, the study argues, takes up the challenge posed by Joyce's "Work in Progress," and Beckett's individualistic reading of Proust, and finally "refus[es] the possibilities of modernist writing" (Said 50). Thus Beckett attempts an "impossible" fiction in which protagonists and narrators reject their roles, the presumption of audience interest is examined and sacrificed, and the speaker's power over language radically questioned. Consequently, More Pricks than Kicks, Murphy, watt, Malone Dies and The Unnameable demonstrate the fictional potential of rejected and "impossible" tactics such as silence, futility, and apparent incompetence.</p> <p>The study demonstrates that the isolated individualism of Beckett's protagonists is associated with a breakdown of language and self, a process that provides a fictional anticipation of the theoretical view that language removed from either actual or conventional situations of utterance and reply ("writing" as opposed to speech) becomes an autonomous sign-system which remains silent about questions of self and identity. (Since it is only in human dialogue, in taking up an anchored subject-position within language, that a speaker's subjectivity can emerge). Beckett's protagonists, seeking to maintain their distance from the social distribution of subject positions, and seeking to propagate their personal monologue outside any dialogue, find themselves lost in a "moment before speech," or in language without parole, and thus are unable to base their own subjectivity in the unmoored or ungrounded discourse they inhabit. To explicate these implicit ideas, I turn to theorists of language and the self such as Emile Benveniste and Jacques Lacan (whose ideas were developing at the same time as Beckett was writing the works treated: in Paris in the 1930's). iv</p>en_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/9012en_US
dc.identifier.other10096en_US
dc.identifier.other5615357en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14188
dc.subjectSamuel Becketten_US
dc.subjectRegressen_US
dc.subjectFictionen_US
dc.subject1953en_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.titleSamuel Beckett's Work in Regress: A study of the Fiction to 1953en_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
7.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format