Food Sovereignty: An Emancipatory Human Right
| dc.contributor.advisor | Doubleday, Nancy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kashyap, Mrinal | |
| dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-19T18:18:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-10-19T18:18:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The globalized neoliberal agricultural regime operates within a neocolonial context and was therefore built upon the ideologies, law, and legacy of the colonial-era. Both capitalism and colonialism, in theory, and in practice, share characteristics that are inherently contrary to the realization of human rights. Given that the human rights framework operates within a globalized capitalist economy, there are systemic barriers to the universal realization of human rights. This thesis holds that the concept of food sovereignty not only highlights this reality but presents a nuanced emancipatory path forward towards a post-capitalist world where universal human rights realization is not only possible but inherent to the functioning of food sovereignty itself. Food sovereignty presents as a praxis for Marxist agrarian theory in establishing an approach to closing the metabolic rift. The existence of the Food Sovereignty Movement also confirms the existence of the metabolic rift as the theoretical disconnect between capitalism and human rights which underpins the current agricultural system. As a concept, it accounts for the systemic obstacles to the universal realization of the right to adequate food while also providing an alternative food system centred on the decisions of small-scale food producers. Contrary to capitalist and colonialist approaches to food production, food sovereignty is concerned with universal access to culturally appropriate nutritious foods produced through ecological means. Through a combination of normative and descriptive claims, this thesis examines the official recognition and realization of the right to food sovereignty as a proxy of Marxist ideology. Food sovereignty empowers the rights-holder to ensure the continued realization of their right to adequate food in underscoring the fact that rights realization is not static in nature but, an ongoing endeavour. As such, the process called for to implement an alternative food system is one of decolonization. | en_US |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
| dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.description.layabstract | Despite the existence of enough food for the sustenance of the global populace, there are obstacles prohibiting economic and physical access to food. These obstacles are created and maintained by the institutions and social structures that put forth policies encouraging economic and social inequality. The role which small-scale food producers play in global society is integral to the realization of the human right to adequate food. However, the current agricultural system de-values their work. Conceptually, food sovereignty highlights the oppressive nature of the agricultural system and puts forth a response that focuses on small-scale food producers assuming control over the food system. Commodification and exploitation are inherent characteristics of both the capitalist and colonial systems. Food sovereignty aims at dismantling oppressive systems through anti-capitalist and anti-colonial efforts sanctioned by the mobilization and collaboration of oppressed peoples within the context of food production. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25941 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Food Sovereignty | en_US |
| dc.subject | human rights | en_US |
| dc.subject | colonialism | en_US |
| dc.subject | capitalism | en_US |
| dc.title | Food Sovereignty: An Emancipatory Human Right | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |