Dyad versus solo training during visuomotor adaptation
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
From tango dancing to paddling a canoe, humans often coordinate their actions to
achieve shared goals. While previous research has shown that dyadic motor tasks
can enhance performance during joint action (Ganesh et al., 2014; Takagi et al., 2017),
the effects of such collaboration on later solo performance remain debated (Beckers
et al., 2020; Che et al., 2016). In particular, few studies have examined how the nature
of partner interaction shapes individual learning when both contributors are aware of
their shared control. Here, we investigated how performing a visuomotor adaptation
task with a partner affects subsequent individual performance. Participants (N =
96) completed 50 baseline trials followed by 200 adaptation trials with a 30-degree
clockwise or counterclockwise cursor rotation. This was followed by 20 counter-
adaptation and 50 error-clamp trials before returning after a 5-minute break to repeat
the same task individually. Half of the participants completed the initial session alone
(Solos, N = 48) while the other half completed it in dyads (Dyads, N = 48) with both
partners contributing simultaneously to a shared cursor trajectory. All participants
adapted successfully during training. However, only those in the solo condition showed
robust savings in the second session. Across dyads, three characteristic interaction
patterns were observed, each with distinct implications for how individuals engaged
with the perturbation. Participants who trained in dyads exhibited significantly weaker
early re-adaptation, particularly when their partner had taken over the majority of
the initial corrections. These findings suggest that while collaboration can support
immediate task success, it does not guarantee lasting individual learning. This work
encourages future research to clarify the mechanisms that underlie coordinated
motor adaptation between two individuals. A greater understanding of how people
interact and share control could help refine motor learning protocols in rehabilitative
or human-machine interaction settings.