The Ethical Generalization Argument
| dc.contributor.advisor | Najm, Sami | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Rullman, Irving Robert | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:52:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:52:25Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2011-08-08 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 1968-10 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>This thesis examines the ethical generalization argument from a methodological point of view. The generalization is not considered in a historical (Kantian) I sense of deductive implication, but rather in a more I empirical fashion of behavoristic investigation. The argument, its: limitations, and other attendant problems are analyzed.The final recommendations combine several I approaches within and without standard philosophical procedure.</p> | en_US |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/5759 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | 6780 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | 2138171 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10732 | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
| dc.title | The Ethical Generalization Argument | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1