Re-Cognizing Co-Management as Co-Governance: Histories and Visions of Conservation at James Bay
| dc.contributor.author | Feit, Harvey A | |
| dc.contributor.department | Anthropology | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-16T23:19:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-02-16T23:19:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.description | In this paper I draw on insights and work of many Cree people and other colleagues. I want to specially acknowledge my debt for unexpected ideas to: Philip Awashish, Mario Blaser, Jasmin Habib, and Colin Scott. I also want to thank: Matthew Coon Come, Brian Craik, Paul Dixon, Samuel C. Gull, Peter Hutchins, Toby Morantz, Ted Moses, Monica Mulrennan, the Late Eva and Joeseph Ottereyes, Jr., Matthew Ottereyes, Alan Penn, Susan Preston, Alan Saganash, Jr., and Joe Spaeder. The article is available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25606240 It appears in the repository by permission of University of Toronto Press Journals, email 2019/02/13. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | James Bay Cree “hunting leaders” claim extensive authority over their hunting territories, including authority to control non-native activities on them. They are encouraged by recalling that their authority has been recognized repeatedly by government officials over decades. I show that beaver conservation and co-management included repeated acknowledgements that nation state and Cree governing practices co-existed and were necessary to each other. I examine how recognition of co-governance can be an “effect” of co-management. But co-governance is a governmentality whose logic is outside the claims of nation states to exclusive sovereignty, and therefore its practice is acknowledged ambiguously and inconsistently. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Arts Research Board of McMaster University. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Feit, Harvey A. 2005. “Re-Cognizing Co-Management as Co-Governance: Histories and Visions of Conservation at James Bay.” Anthropologica. 47 (2): 267-288. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25606240 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-5459 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23908 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Anthropologica | en_US |
| dc.subject | Co-management | en_US |
| dc.subject | Governance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Governmentality | en_US |
| dc.subject | Conservation | en_US |
| dc.subject | James Bay Cree | en_US |
| dc.subject | Nation states | en_US |
| dc.title | Re-Cognizing Co-Management as Co-Governance: Histories and Visions of Conservation at James Bay | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |