Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Pay Equity, Discrimination and Undervaluation

dc.contributor.advisorLewis, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorDick, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:57:33Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:57:33Z
dc.date.created2012-03-13en_US
dc.date.issued1987en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>Comparable worth legislation is designed to remedy what its proponents perceive to be the systematic and entrenched under-valuation of the labour of those who work in occupations in which women predominate. Comparable worth legislation would mandate equal pay for certain jobs within an establishment judged by some standard as of equivalent value, absent certain sanctioned exceptions. After outlining the major points at issue in the comparable worth debate, this thesis looks at the argument that current practice in labour markets engenders or perpetuates a discriminatory condition harmful to certain groups. It then argues that the conceptual heart of the pay equity advocacy is an attack on the market as a pricing vehicle in the name of a theory of distributive justice heavily reliant on the concept of desert.</p>en_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6859en_US
dc.identifier.other7901en_US
dc.identifier.other2663629en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11930
dc.subjectPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.titlePay Equity, Discrimination and Undervaluationen_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
57.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format