A Discourse Analysis of First and Second Thessalonians
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This dissertation employs discourse analysis, grounded in the linguistic concept of
register within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), to explore the relationship
between First and Second Thessalonians, positing that both texts are authentic Pauline
letters. Challenging the prevalent view of pseudonymous authorship of 2 Thessalonians,
which is based on alleged situational inconsistencies with 1 Thessalonians, this study
argues for a consistent ideational, interpersonal, and textual meaning across both letters,
thereby affirming their shared context of situation. Through a meticulous register
analysis, this research provides a fresh perspective on the debate over Pauline authorship
by demonstrating that the arguments traditionally used to either contest or support the
authenticity of 2 Thessalonians—centered around semantic and structural features—do
not hold when the language of the texts is closely examined.
Moreover, the study delineates how both letters actualize specific semantic and
structural potentials related to their registers, thereby generating meanings through
various linguistic elements and structures. It scrutinizes claims of internal inconsistencies,
focusing on aspects such as eschatological views, attitudinal stances towards recipients,
and modes of interaction, to assess whether these purported differences undermine the
attribution of both texts to Paul. Additionally, it explores how the Thessalonian correspondence constructs its context of situation linguistically, without relying on
historical presumptions, thereby offering insights into the communicative purpose and the
thematic concerns of the letters.
Ultimately, this dissertation contributes to the discourse on New Testament
authorship by suggesting that a nuanced understanding of the linguistic features of First
and Second Thessalonians can illuminate their relationship and authenticity. This
approach invites a reevaluation of the criteria used in the scholarly debate on Pauline
authorship and encourages a deeper appreciation of the complex interplay between
language, context, and meaning in these foundational Christian texts.