Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

THE ARTICULATION OF PUBLIC VALUES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: THE USE OF DELIBERATIVE DISCOURSE

dc.contributor.advisorJulia Abelson, PhDen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMita Giacomini, PhDen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAndrea Frolic, PhDen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimeonov, Dorinaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:54:00Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:54:00Z
dc.date.created2011-09-21en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The use of interactive public engagement methods to elicit public values is becoming routine practice in health system planning, policy and evaluation; however, little systematic attention has been given to the analysis of how these values are articulated. This process will be examined with the use of deliberative discourse methods in the context of health technologies. Approach: The deliberations of a 14-person Citizens’ Reference Panel on Health Technologies were audiotaped and transcribed. The panel provided input to the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee in developing its recommendations. Discussion transcripts were analyzed using Gee’s (2005) ‘building tasks’ framework with a focus on identities, relationships, and politics. In depth language-context analysis was then used to study ‘situated meanings’ of social and ethical citizen values. Both levels of discourse analysis were then used to elicit the meso-level dynamics within the citizen panel deliberations. Results: Panel members used the provided materials, personal experience and other sources of information to express their values toward the technologies under review. In the group, members used their occupational, personal and cultural identities and adopted in-group citizen panel roles that involved summarizing small group discussions, challenging other members, providing information, providing expertise, interpreting information and facilitating. These individual roles were similar across meetings and members began to form relationships with their fellow citizens and make connections between the values involved in similar technologies. Conclusion: Discourse analysis methods can be used to draw in-depth insights from public engagement deliberations which contribute important new knowledge to the field of public deliberation and health policy. Further use and refinement of deliberative discourse methods will allow public values to be better understood and more adequately portrayed in the health technology assessment process.en_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6216en_US
dc.identifier.other7232en_US
dc.identifier.other2249799en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11233
dc.subjectpublic engagementen_US
dc.subjectdeliberative discourseen_US
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen_US
dc.subjecthealth technology assessmenten_US
dc.subjectHealth Policyen_US
dc.subjectHealth Policyen_US
dc.titleTHE ARTICULATION OF PUBLIC VALUES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: THE USE OF DELIBERATIVE DISCOURSEen_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
743.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format