COVID-19 living evidence profile #5 (version 5.2): What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in other countries, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted?
| dc.contributor.author | Waddell, K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wilson, MG | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bain, T | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bhuiya, AR | |
| dc.contributor.author | Al-Khateeb, S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sharma, K | |
| dc.contributor.author | DeMaio, P | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bierman, O | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lavis, JN | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-17T13:35:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-17T13:35:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-07 | |
| dc.description.abstract | An overview of the best available research evidence from around the world (i.e., evidence syntheses) and local research evidence (i.e., single studies) and, if applicable, a scan of experiences from other countries and from Canadian provinces and territories, about what went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in other countries, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted in response to a decision-maker’s request. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | To help health- and social-system leaders as they respond to unprecedented challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the McMaster Health Forum is preparing rapid evidence profiles like this one. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Waddell KA, Wilson MG, Bain T, Bhuiya A, Al-Khateeb S, Sharma K, DeMaio P, Bierman O, Lavis JN. COVID-19 living evidence profile #5 (version 5.2): What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in other countries, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted? Hamilton: McMaster Health Forum, 15 July 2021. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31981 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | LEP 5.2; | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en_US |
| dc.subject | response | en_US |
| dc.subject | countries | en_US |
| dc.subject | future | en_US |
| dc.subject | foresight | en_US |
| dc.subject | work | en_US |
| dc.title | COVID-19 living evidence profile #5 (version 5.2): What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in other countries, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted? | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
- Name:
- COVID-19 living evidence profile 5.2_What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in other countries, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted.pdf
- Size:
- 395.19 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
- Name:
- COVID-19 living evidence profile 5.2-appendix_What went well and what could have gone better in the COVID-19 response in other countries, as well as what will need to go well in future given any available foresight work being conducted.pdf
- Size:
- 789.47 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.68 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: