Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Contested Identities of ‘Indians’ and ‘Whitemen’ at James Bay, or the Power of Reason, Hybridity and Agency

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Senri Ethnological Studies (Osaka)

Abstract

In "We Have Never Been Modern" Bruno Latour notes the connections, separations and the "hybridity" of colonial uses of discourses and practices of modernity (Latour 1993). In this paper I examine discourses about identities and practical relationships that develop between institutions of a modern national state society and an Indigenous people. I suggest that the modern state/developer and James Bay Cree claims about each other's identities, their efforts to differentiate identities, and their relational practices, implicate them in both explicit and implicit recognition of complex differences, similarities, hybridity and agency. Yet there are numerous ways that this happens. The distinctions and similarities often are closely linked to the way that moralities locate and legitimate an active subject.

Description

This article is online as an Open Access resource at the National Museum of Ethnography Repository (Osaka). The repository is at https://minpaku.ac.jp/english/research/sharing . The article is at: https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/index.php?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_snippet&index_id=255&pn=1&count=20&order=7&lang=japanese&page_id=13&block_id=21 .

Citation

Feit, Harvey A. 2004. “Contested Identities of ‘Indians’ and ‘Whitemen’ at James Bay, or the Power of Reason, Hybridity and Agency.” In Senri Ethnological Studies (Osaka) 66: 109-126.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By