Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

The Low Frequency Superiority Effect in Recognition Memory

dc.contributor.advisorLevy, Betty Annen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuzzin, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:47:27Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:47:27Z
dc.date.created2011-06-08en_US
dc.date.issued1972en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>Two explanations for the low-frequency superiority effect in recognition memory are described and a third, distractor-type hypothesis is developed. The distractor-type hypothesis proposes that Ss have a preference for abstracting semantic features from high-frequency words and acoustic features from low-frequency words. It suggests that low-frequency superiority is a result of semantic interference with high-frequency words combined with a lack of acoustic interference with low-frequency wods. The results of three experiments which support this hypothesis are required. Experiments I and II showed that more acoustic than semantic-type errors are made with low-frequency words and more semantic than acoustic-type errors are made with high-frequency words in the recognition memory paradigm. Experiments III of this series examined the relationship of the distractor type and distractor frequency variables.</p>en_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/4641en_US
dc.identifier.other5660en_US
dc.identifier.other2051655en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/9526
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleThe Low Frequency Superiority Effect in Recognition Memoryen_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
1.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format