UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING PATIENT PORTALS FOR OLDER ADULTS
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
As technology advances, we see the digitization of many crucial services,
including healthcare. Patient portals provide patients with quick access to their
personal health information, the ability to perform health management tasks,
educational materials, and more. Patient portals are rapidly increasing in
adoption, and becoming a core part of the healthcare experience. Although
patient portals show promise in improving healthcare outcomes and experiences,
these solutions are not equally accessible to all.
Older adults face unique barriers to using patient portal including limited
digital literacy, physical and cognitive limitations, and issues arising from a lack of
consideration of older adults in patient portal design. This thesis examined the
state of patient portal use amongst older adults, facilitators and barriers to portal
use and adoption, frameworks and strategies to improve the adoption and use of
patient portals, and roadmaps for selecting and including these frameworks into
patient portal development and implementation.
Chapter 2 employed a systematic review to examine the use of patient
portals by older adults, the features most frequently accessed by older adults,
and the facilitators and barriers to older adults’ use and adoption of patient
portals. The systematic review revealed lower use of patient portals amongst
older, low socioeconomic status, low education, non-English speaking older
adults, amongst other factors. Patient portals were most frequently used to
access personal health information, or perform health management tasks such as booking appointments or renewing prescriptions. The barriers and facilitators
revealed pathways forward; building trust and value, supporting and engaging
portal use, advancing community capacities, and simplifying patient portals.
These pathways surrounded by a focus on EDI can serve to make patient portals
more accessible for older adults of all walks of life.
Chapter 3 employed a multi-modal search of databases and gray literature
to provide a list of 11 frameworks, 6 of which can be used to ensure equity is
promoted, 3 of which are focused specifically on pathways to improving use and
adoption of technologies, and 2 of which are focused on ensuring the protection
and control of sensitive data by minority groups.
Chapter 4 brings the findings of earlier sections together by exploring
actionable pathways to implementing the suggestions made in Chapter 2 and
Chapter 3. Chapter 4 lays out roadmaps for incorporating frameworks for the
improvement of equity within development and implementation projects and lays
out liberatory design as a potential pathway for developers to consider EDI
throughout the design process.