Documentation of 37-Element, Nominal Pressure Tube, Coolant Mixing Model
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In this report a new subchannel mixing model that is based on an initial model
from references [1,2] is documented. The model is intended for use in the fuel channel
behaviour code, FACTAR. The new model predicts the steady state, single-phase
(vapour) coolant mixing in 37-element bundles for nominal geometry pressure tubes
only. The operating conditions on which the model is based are consistent with those
found in the early and late blowdown stages following a large break loss of coolant
accident (LBLOCA). It is assumed that coolant mixing is a process consisting of three
mixing mechanisms; turbulent diffusion mixing, mixing due to diversion flow around
appendages, and buoyancy induced mixing. The model makes use of subchannel
mass flow fraction correlations developed from the output of the subchannel mixing
code ASSERT PV V3.0. The model predicts the coolant mixing from the 1st bundle to
the 12th bundle of a channel. The model implicitly predicts the quantity of heat that is
lost to the moderator. The model makes use of mean cross-flow mass transfer
correlations developed from the output of ASSERT PV V3.0 in order to improve
prediction of coolant mixing under buoyancy dominated flows. The new model gives
reasonably accurate predictions of subchannel mixing for both convection and
buoyancy dominated flows, and also gives reasonably accurate predictions of heat lost
to the moderator.
The new model discussed in this report relies heavily on the use of the ASSERT
PV V3.0 subchannel mixing code. There is some speculation as to the ability of
ASSERT to properly predict coolant mixing under low flow conditions. For this reason,
included in this report is a discussion of the applicability of ASSERT PV V3.0 to the
prediction of subchannel mixing under low flow conditions. This discussion revolves
around some informative input from the developers of ASSERT. Based on this input it
has tentatively been concluded that within the boundary operating conditions and
geometry specifications examined in this report, ASSERT results are reasonably
trustworthy.