Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Smart agriculture: Development of a skid-steer autonomous robot with advanced model predictive controllers

dc.contributor.authorZhu CW
dc.contributor.authorHill E
dc.contributor.authorBiglarbegian M
dc.contributor.authorGadsden SA
dc.contributor.authorCline JA
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-27T16:35:52Z
dc.date.available2025-02-27T16:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.date.updated2025-02-27T16:35:48Z
dc.description.abstractThe agricultural domain has been experiencing extensive automation interest over the past decade. The established process for measuring physiological and morphological traits (phenotypes) of crops is labour-intensive and error-prone. In this paper, a mobile robotic platform, namely The Autonomous Robot for Orchard Surveying (AROS), was developed to automate the process of collecting spatial and visual data autonomously. Furthermore, six different control frameworks are presented to evaluate the feasibility of using a kinematic model in agricultural environments. The kinematic model does not consider wheel slippage or any forces associated with dynamic motion. Thus, the following six controllers are evaluated: Proportional-Derivative (PD) controller, Sliding Mode Controller (SMC), Control-Lyapunov Function (CLF), Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller (NMPC), Tube-Based Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller (TBNMPC), and Model Predictive Sliding Mode Control (MPSMC). This paper provides insight into the degree of disturbance rejection that the mentioned control architectures can achieve in outdoor environments. Experimental results validate that all control architectures are capable of rejecting the present disturbances associated with unmodelled dynamics and wheel slip on soft ground conditions. Additionally, the optimal-based controllers managed to perform better than the non-optimal controllers. Performance improvements of the TBNMPC of up to 209.72% are realized when compared to non-optimal methods. Results also show that the non-optimal controllers had low performance due to the underactuated constraint present in the kinematic model.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2023.104364
dc.identifier.issn0921-8890
dc.identifier.issn1872-793X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/31150
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subject4007 Control Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject4010 Engineering Practice and Education
dc.titleSmart agriculture: Development of a skid-steer autonomous robot with advanced model predictive controllers
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
081-1-s2.0-S0921889023000039-main.pdf
Size:
2.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version