Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

CHANGE DETECTION OF A SCENE FOLLOWING A VIEWPOINT CHANGE: MECHANISMS FOR THE REDUCED PERFORMANCE COST WHEN THE VIEWPOINT CHANGE IS CAUSED BY VIEWER LOCOMOTION

dc.contributor.advisorSun, Hong-Jinen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBruce Milliken, Sue Beckeren_US
dc.contributor.authorComishen, Michael A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:20Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:20Z
dc.date.created2013-09-27en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>When an observer detects changes in a scene from a viewpoint that is different from the learned viewpoint, viewpoint change caused by observer’s locomotion would lead to better recognition performance compared to a situation where the viewpoint change is caused by equivalent movement of the scene. While such benefit of observer locomotion could be caused by spatial updating through body-based information (Simons and Wang 1998), or knowledge of change of reference direction gained through locomotion (Mou et al, 2009). The effect of such reference direction information have been demonstrated through the effect of a visual cue (e.g., a chopstick) presented during the testing phase indicating the original learning viewpoint (Mou et al, 2009).</p> <p>In the current study, we re-examined the mechanisms of such benefit of observer locomotion. Six experiments were performed using a similar change detection paradigm. Experiment 1 & 2 adopted the design as that in Mou et al. (2009). The results were inconsistent with the results from Mou et al (2009) in that even with the visual indicator, the performance (accuracy and response time) in the table rotation condition was still significantly worse than that in the observer locomotion condition. In Experiments 3-5, we compared performance in the normal walking condition with conditions where the body-based information may not be reliable (disorientation or walking over a long path). The results again showed a lack of benefit with the visual indicator. Experiment 6 introduced a more salient and intrinsic reference direction: coherent object orientations. Unlike the previous experiments, performance in the scene rotation condition was similar to that in the observer locomotion condition.</p> <p>Overall we showed that the body-based information in observer locomotion may be the most prominent information. The knowledge of the reference direction could be useful but might only be effective in limited scenarios such as a scene with a dominant orientation.</p>en_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8372en_US
dc.identifier.other9468en_US
dc.identifier.other4640438en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13536
dc.subjectchange detectionen_US
dc.subjectproprioceptionen_US
dc.subjectscene recognitionen_US
dc.subjectspatial reference directionen_US
dc.subjectspatial updatingen_US
dc.subjectviewer locomotionen_US
dc.subjectviewpoint changeen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.titleCHANGE DETECTION OF A SCENE FOLLOWING A VIEWPOINT CHANGE: MECHANISMS FOR THE REDUCED PERFORMANCE COST WHEN THE VIEWPOINT CHANGE IS CAUSED BY VIEWER LOCOMOTIONen_US
dc.typethesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fulltext.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format