Welcome to the upgraded MacSphere! We're putting the finishing touches on it; if you notice anything amiss, email macsphere@mcmaster.ca

Equity in health care funding [electronic resource]

dc.contributor.authorHutchison, Brian Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorCentre for Health Economics and Policy Analysisen_US
dc.coverage.spatialOntarioen_US
dc.coverage.spatialOntarioen_US
dc.coverage.spatialOntarioen_US
dc.coverage.spatialOntarioen_US
dc.coverage.spatialOntarioen_US
dc.coverage.spatialOntarioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T14:42:04Z
dc.date.available2015-04-14T14:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.descriptionBrian Hutchison ... [et al.].en_US
dc.descriptionTitle from title page of source document (viewed Feb. 6, 2004).en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.descriptionMode of access: World Wide Web.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The geographic distribution of health care funding in Canada has traditionally been based on past allocations and the distribution of health care facilities and providers. Whether this approach has succeeded in distributing resources among populations in keeping with relative health care needs is unknown. Methods: Using data on self-assessed health status and utilization of health care services from the Ontario Health Survey, data on health care expenditures from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and population data from Statistics Canada, we compared actual health care expenditures for geographically-defined populations in Ontario to allocations based on relative population need as represented by age, sex and self-assessed health status. Comparisons were made at the regional (Health Region), district (District Health Council) and local (Public Health Unit) levels. Results: Expenditures and needs-based allocations were significantly different for 4 of 7 regions, 9 of 15 districts and 23 of 42 local areas. At the regional level, needs-based allocations ranged from 8.9% higher to 6.4% lower than actual expenditures. For districts, needs-based allocations ranged from 12.9% higher to 9.8% lower than expenditures. At the local level, needs-based allocations ranged from 23.8% higher to 18.8% lower than expenditures. Intraclass correlation coefficients measuring agreement between needs-based per capita expenditures and actual per capita expenditures were 0.86, 0.74 and 0.58 for regions, districts and local areas respectively. Interpretation: Although, on average, the differences between needs-based allocations and actual health care expenditures were not large, the discrepancies were substantial for many geographic areas. The adoption in Ontario of funding methods based on relative population needs would improve equity in the allocation of health care resources to populations and result in a considerable redistribution of resources.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.chepa.org/portals/0/pdf/03-03.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/17140
dc.publisherMcMaster University, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCHEPA working paper series 03-03en_US
dc.subjectHealth Expendituresen_US
dc.subjectstatistics & numerical dataen_US
dc.subjectHealth Resourcesen_US
dc.subjecteconomicsen_US
dc.subjectHealth Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectorganization & administrationen_US
dc.subjectHealth Services Needs and Demanden_US
dc.subjectstatistics & numerical dataen_US
dc.subjectResource Allocationen_US
dc.subjectstatistics & numerical dataen_US
dc.subjectHealth Statusen_US
dc.titleEquity in health care funding [electronic resource]en_US
dc.typetexten_US

Files