Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/9470
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorParker, L.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorHarris, W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHou, Annieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:47:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:47:15Z-
dc.date.created2011-06-07en_US
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/4591en_US
dc.identifier.other5610en_US
dc.identifier.other2049631en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/9470-
dc.description.abstract<p>The dynamical state of galaxy groups at intermediate redshifts can provide information about the growth of structure in the universe. We examine three goodness-of-fit tests, the Anderson-Darling (A-D), Kolmogorov and X<sup>2</sup> tests, in order to determine which statistical tool is best able to distinguish between groups that are relaxed and those that are dynamically complex. We perform Monte Carlo simulations of these three tests and show that the X<sup>2</sup> test is profoundly unreliable for groups with fewer than 30 members. Power studies of the Kolmogorov and A-D tests are conducted to test their robustness for various sample sizes. We then apply these tests to a sample of the second Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology Redshift Survey (CNOC2) galaxy groups and find that the A-D test is more reliable and powerful at detecting real departures from an underlying Gaussian distribution than the more commonly used X<sup>2</sup> and Kolmogorov tests. We use this statistic to classify a sample of the CNOC2 groups and find that 34 of 106 groups are inconsistent with an underlying Gaussian velocity distribution, and thus do not appear relaxed. In addition, we compute velocity dispersion profiles (VDPs) for all groups with more than 20 members and compare the overall features of the Gaussian and non-Gaussian groups, finding that the VDPs of the non-Gaussian groups are distinct from those classified as Gaussian. We also compare group properties of both rich individual groups and stacked groups to determine if any there are any trends amongst the classified Gaussian and non-Gaussian groups.</p>en_US
dc.subjectAstrophysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectAstrophysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleGalaxy Group Dynamics: Statistical Analysis and Comparison of Group Propertiesen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
27.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue