Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/8055
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLove, R. F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDowling, Douglas Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:41:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:41:44Z-
dc.date.created2010-09-20en_US
dc.date.issued1985-09en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/3292en_US
dc.identifier.other4315en_US
dc.identifier.other1566863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/8055-
dc.description.abstract<p>Several methods have been proposed and tested for calculating lower bounds on the objective function of facilities problems. These methods contribute to the efficiency of iterative solution methods by allowing the user to terminate the computation process when the objective function comes within a predetermined fraction of the optimal solution. Two of the existing bounding methods have been presented only for single facility location models with Euclidean (straight-line) distances. One of these methods uses the dual of the single facility location model to compute a lower bound. This thesis introduces a method for generating a feasible dual solution from any primal solution by means of a projection matrix. The projection matrix method is applied to single and multi-facility models. The second bounding method, which involves the solution of a rectilinear distance model to obtain a lower bound, is extended in this thesis to include a generalized, distance function and the multi-facility situation. Computation results for the two new bounding methods are compared with several existing bounding methods. These results should aid practitioners in selecting an appropriate bounding method for an iterative solution method to a facilities location problem.</p>en_US
dc.subjectManagement Information Systemsen_US
dc.subjectManagement Sciences and Quantitative Methodsen_US
dc.subjectManagement Information Systemsen_US
dc.titleBounding Methods for Facilities Location Problemsen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentManagement Science/Systemsen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue