Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32609
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDavies, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorLy, Anna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T15:43:41Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-29T15:43:41Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32609-
dc.description.abstractThe Pitman closeness (PC) criterion is a method to compare two statistical estimators. Assuming that the lifetime data follow an exponential distribution with scale parameter $\theta$, prior work had computed the PC probabilities for estimators of $\theta$ based on Type-I right-censoring, Type-II right-censoring and Type-I hybrid censoring schemes (HCS). However, the derivation of the PC under a Type-II HCS has not yet been addressed in the literature. This thesis examines two comparisons of maximum likelihood estimators for $\theta$, the scale parameter, for exponentially distributed lifetimes arising from the Type-II HCS: (1) between estimators corresponding to different numbers of observed failures, and (2) between estimators with different censoring times. Closed-form expressions for the PC probabilities are derived, and numerical results are reported for various sample sizes, censoring times, and study durations. Numerical results show that increasing the pre-fixed termination time or the number of failures led to an estimator that was always Pitman closer to the true parameter. These findings confirm the intuition that increasing the termination time or the number of observed failures will usually lead to an estimator that is Pitman closer than one based on a shorter termination time or fewer observed failures.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPitman Closenessen_US
dc.subjectMaximum Likelihood Estimatorsen_US
dc.subjectHybrid Censoringen_US
dc.subjectExponential Distributionen_US
dc.titlePitman Closeness of Maximum Likelihood Estimators Under Type-II Hybrid Censoring With Exponential Lifetimeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentStatisticsen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractResearchers are often interested in the time it takes for a certain event to happen. For example, in medical studies, we may ask how long it takes a patient to recover, while in engineering, we may study how long a product works before it fails. This type of information, which measures the time until an event occurs, is called lifetime data. Collecting such data can be difficult because studies often end before every recovery or failure has been observed, resulting in incomplete data. To make sense of incomplete data, statisticians use statistical inference, a process where they make inferences about the population from available data. There is a special type of statistical inference, called estimation, where mathematical formulas called estimators are used to approximate important features of said population. This thesis examines how to decide which estimator is more accurate among a given class under a specific data collection scheme. Using a mathematical tool called the Pitman closeness criterion, we derive and compute exact expressions for making pairwise comparisons among three different estimators that depend on the length of the study and the number of observations collected. Our results, based on this criterion, support the intuitive idea that extending the study period or increasing the number of observations leads to producing a better estimator according to the Pitman closeness criterion in a particular data collection scheme.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ly_anna_finalsubmission2025october_msc.pdf
Open Access
1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue