Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32401
Title: SOCIAL MODERATORS OF AGENCY
Other Titles: SOCIAL INFLUENCES ON THE SENSE OF AGENCY: THE EFFECTS OF ACUTE PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS AND ACTION INSTRUCTION ON PERCEIVED AND IMPLICIT CONTROL
Authors: Edwards, Salina
Advisor: Obhi, Sukhvinder S.
Department: Neuroscience
Keywords: Sense of agency, intentional binding, stress, action intruction
Publication Date: 2025
Abstract: The experience of control is referred to as the sense of agency (SoA). Most healthy individuals experience agency for their actions however, this can be disrupted under specific contexts. Intriguingly, there is little research about how SoA is affected by stress, a common everyday experience, or action instruction by external agents. Across two empirical chapters and four studies, we employ both implicit (intentional binding; IB) and explicit (self-reported control ratings) measures to provide a multidimensional account of how agency is shaped in these social contexts. In Chapter 2, we examined whether acute psychosocial stress modulates SoA. Stress was induced using the Trier Social Stress Test, followed by a task in which participants performed voluntary actions that produced auditory effects after varying time delays. In Study 1, explicit ratings of perceived control were obtained, while Study 2 employed IB as an implicit index of agency. Results from the implicit task revealed significantly greater SoA at longer delays (700 ms) under stress, suggesting a potential “stress-enabled agency boost” which may be linked to adaptive mechanisms, such as the fight-or-flight response. In Chapter 3, we explored how externally instructed actions by another human versus an artificial agent (onscreen chatbot) affect SoA. In both studies, participants completed an action-effect timing task under three conditions: free choice, human instruction, and agent instruction. Findings consistently showed that SoA was strongest under free choice, diminished under human instruction, and was the lowest under agent instruction. Notably, both IB and control ratings followed a linear pattern, with human instruction falling between the extremes. Together, these findings contribute to the growing literature on socially moderated agency, highlighting how stress and instructional contexts can influence individuals’ subjective and perceptual experiences of control. This work also raises important implications for understanding agency in environments increasingly mediated by technology.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32401
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Edwards_Salina_E_202509_MScNeuroscience.pdf
Open Access
1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue