Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32401
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorObhi, Sukhvinder S.-
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Salina-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T19:10:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-24T19:10:45Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32401-
dc.description.abstractThe experience of control is referred to as the sense of agency (SoA). Most healthy individuals experience agency for their actions however, this can be disrupted under specific contexts. Intriguingly, there is little research about how SoA is affected by stress, a common everyday experience, or action instruction by external agents. Across two empirical chapters and four studies, we employ both implicit (intentional binding; IB) and explicit (self-reported control ratings) measures to provide a multidimensional account of how agency is shaped in these social contexts. In Chapter 2, we examined whether acute psychosocial stress modulates SoA. Stress was induced using the Trier Social Stress Test, followed by a task in which participants performed voluntary actions that produced auditory effects after varying time delays. In Study 1, explicit ratings of perceived control were obtained, while Study 2 employed IB as an implicit index of agency. Results from the implicit task revealed significantly greater SoA at longer delays (700 ms) under stress, suggesting a potential “stress-enabled agency boost” which may be linked to adaptive mechanisms, such as the fight-or-flight response. In Chapter 3, we explored how externally instructed actions by another human versus an artificial agent (onscreen chatbot) affect SoA. In both studies, participants completed an action-effect timing task under three conditions: free choice, human instruction, and agent instruction. Findings consistently showed that SoA was strongest under free choice, diminished under human instruction, and was the lowest under agent instruction. Notably, both IB and control ratings followed a linear pattern, with human instruction falling between the extremes. Together, these findings contribute to the growing literature on socially moderated agency, highlighting how stress and instructional contexts can influence individuals’ subjective and perceptual experiences of control. This work also raises important implications for understanding agency in environments increasingly mediated by technology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSense of agency, intentional binding, stress, action intructionen_US
dc.titleSOCIAL MODERATORS OF AGENCYen_US
dc.title.alternativeSOCIAL INFLUENCES ON THE SENSE OF AGENCY: THE EFFECTS OF ACUTE PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS AND ACTION INSTRUCTION ON PERCEIVED AND IMPLICIT CONTROLen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNeuroscienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThis thesis explores the sense of agency—the experience of control over one’s own actions. Across two chapters we investigated how stress and source of action instruction (whether instruction was directed by a person or an onscreen chatbot) affects feelings of control. The results of our first investigation (Chapter 2) found that individuals who experienced social stress felt more in control of their actions when there was a longer delay between their actions and their outcomes, suggesting that stress might sharpen our sense of agency in specific contexts. Our second investigation (Chapter 3) revealed that people feel the most in control when their actions are not instructed, less when instructed by another person, and even less when actions were instructed by an chatbot. These findings provide valuable insights into how everyday experiences, such as feeling stressed or following instructions from people or artificial agents, can shape our experiences of control.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Edwards_Salina_E_202509_MScNeuroscience.pdf
Open Access
1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue