Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32382
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorD'Souza, Rohan-
dc.contributor.authorDorri, Mahya-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T15:48:08Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-24T15:48:08Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32382-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cervical ripening (CR) involves preparing the uterine cervix for the initiation of labour. Outpatient CR is increasingly considered for low-risk pregnancies in the interest of patient satisfaction and reduced utilization of healthcare resources. However, there is no consensus on the optimal method for outpatient CR. Methods We conducted a systematic review and frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to compare CR methods eligible for use in outpatient settings. We searched seven databases through January 2024, without date or language restrictions. Title/abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Cochrane RoB-2.0) were performed independently and in duplicate. We assessed the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Although seven outcomes related to effectiveness, safety and resource use were identified, for purposes of this thesis, we only reported the analysis for the effectiveness outcome, which was defined as attaining a vaginal birth. Effect sizes were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results Our search identified 8490 studies, of which we included 51 RCTs reporting on 1504 pregnancies. We used the standard Foley catheter (FoleySt) as the reference treatment and defined 23 nodes. Oral misoprostol at high initial (more than 50 mcg) and high cumulative (more than 150 mcg) dose was the most effective treatment at achieving a vaginal birth (OR: 2.38; 95%CI: 1.02 to 5.56, RD: 132 more; 95% CI: 4 to 201 more per 1000 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Conclusion High-dose oral misoprostol was found to be the most effective CR method. However, these results should be interpreted in the context of safety and, resource-related outcomes, which remain to be studied.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCervical Ripeningen_US
dc.subjectNetwork Meta-analysisen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods in the outpatient setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractIn some pregnancies, labour needs to be initiated artificially, because of concerns about the health of the mother of baby. This process is called induction of labour (IoL). There is an increasing interest in performing this outside the hospital (outpatient settings) to reduce hospitalization and improve comfort, but the most effective method is still uncertain. This thesis systematically reviewed and combined evidence from 51 randomized trials that studied 23 outpatient IoL methods, in 1504 pregnant people. It found that high-dose oral misoprostol was the most effective method in achieving vaginal birth. Although this research provides new information for clinical practice, further research is needed to assess safety, costs, and patient-important outcomes before practice recommendations can be made.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dorri_Mahya_2025September_MSc.pdf
Embargoed until: 2026-09-19
3.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue