Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Humanities
  4. Department of Communication Studies & Media Arts
  5. Master of Communications Management
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32176
Title: Influencer logic: How influencer relations works
Authors: Gallagher, Shannon
Keywords: influencer(s);influencer marketing;influencer relations;word of mouth marketing;eWOM;organic eWOM;paid eWOM;PESO model;digital word of mouth marketing;eWOMM;attention economy;digital reputation economy;online communities;virtual communities;online advertising;online advertising avoidance;online advertising measurement;relationship marketing;peer-to-peer marketing;ecology of advertising roles;anchor content;filler content;content creator(s);microcelebrities;click thru rate;Facebook;Twitter;Instagram;YouTube;Snapchat;business logic;science logic;artistic logic;technical logic;influencer logic;12 phases of effective influencer relations;collaborative diplomatic attitude;exceptional communication skills;deeply digital literate;JIM disclosure approval continuum
Publication Date: 2019
Abstract: This study identified a gap within the ecology of roles within communication and added “influencer relations” to the nomenclature. The aim was to test if influencer relations fit within the communication department logic as previously identified by Grabher (2002) who established the terms “business logic”, “scientific logic”, and “artistic logic” and “technical logic” as identified by Takemura. The overwhelming answer was that while influencer relations borrows from these roles, it is itself a separate and distinct role requiring “influencer logic”. In addition, the study looked at the skills, aptitudes, and competencies that make this liaison between the company and influencers exceptional at the job, identifying three areas of influencer logic: having a collaborative/diplomatic attitude, possessing exceptional communication skills, and being deeply digitally literate. Specific aptitudes included: openness, collaboration, diplomacy, professional communication, organization/time management, relationship builder, having been an influencer, social media expert, and being on top of what is next in the social/influencer space. The results of this study suggest as well that influencer relations is most at home under the PR umbrella. This shift from marketing-led to being a function of PR practice represents a blue-ocean shift. As earned media becomes more of a scarce resource, and because influencers sit at the intersection of earned and paid media and are trusted by their audiences more than traditional paid media, their power has grown to approach that of earned – and they may even hold more power, depending on the target market. In addition, this study suggests that the influencer relations role holds greater value and has longer term ROI when the function is led by the brand. If a full-scale functional area of in-house influencer relations is not possible, the next best thing is to have someone lead the efforts internally and hire an AOR that has a specialization in the area to help with execution. This study found that fully outsourcing influencer relations is not ideal according to any of the stakeholders (brand, influencers or communicators), especially by the influencer group who really prefer a tight relationship and a seat at the brand’s creative table. In the aim of creating a best-practice model for influencer relations, this study proposes a 12-phase critical path for effective influencer campaigns. The 12 phases are: (1) Influencer Program, (2) Influencer Roster, (3) Influencer Outreach, (4) Influencer Proposal, (5) Proposal Approval, (6) Statement of Work, (7) Content Creation, (8) Content Approval, (9) Posting Content, (10) Content Interaction, (11) Post Reporting, and (12) Payment.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32176
Appears in Collections:Master of Communications Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gallagher_Shannon_2019_MCM.pdf
Open Access
2.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue