Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Humanities
  4. Department of Communication Studies & Media Arts
  5. Master of Communications Management
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/32176
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Shannon-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-17T15:31:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-17T15:31:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/32176-
dc.description.abstractThis study identified a gap within the ecology of roles within communication and added “influencer relations” to the nomenclature. The aim was to test if influencer relations fit within the communication department logic as previously identified by Grabher (2002) who established the terms “business logic”, “scientific logic”, and “artistic logic” and “technical logic” as identified by Takemura. The overwhelming answer was that while influencer relations borrows from these roles, it is itself a separate and distinct role requiring “influencer logic”. In addition, the study looked at the skills, aptitudes, and competencies that make this liaison between the company and influencers exceptional at the job, identifying three areas of influencer logic: having a collaborative/diplomatic attitude, possessing exceptional communication skills, and being deeply digitally literate. Specific aptitudes included: openness, collaboration, diplomacy, professional communication, organization/time management, relationship builder, having been an influencer, social media expert, and being on top of what is next in the social/influencer space. The results of this study suggest as well that influencer relations is most at home under the PR umbrella. This shift from marketing-led to being a function of PR practice represents a blue-ocean shift. As earned media becomes more of a scarce resource, and because influencers sit at the intersection of earned and paid media and are trusted by their audiences more than traditional paid media, their power has grown to approach that of earned – and they may even hold more power, depending on the target market. In addition, this study suggests that the influencer relations role holds greater value and has longer term ROI when the function is led by the brand. If a full-scale functional area of in-house influencer relations is not possible, the next best thing is to have someone lead the efforts internally and hire an AOR that has a specialization in the area to help with execution. This study found that fully outsourcing influencer relations is not ideal according to any of the stakeholders (brand, influencers or communicators), especially by the influencer group who really prefer a tight relationship and a seat at the brand’s creative table. In the aim of creating a best-practice model for influencer relations, this study proposes a 12-phase critical path for effective influencer campaigns. The 12 phases are: (1) Influencer Program, (2) Influencer Roster, (3) Influencer Outreach, (4) Influencer Proposal, (5) Proposal Approval, (6) Statement of Work, (7) Content Creation, (8) Content Approval, (9) Posting Content, (10) Content Interaction, (11) Post Reporting, and (12) Payment.en_US
dc.subjectinfluencer(s)en_US
dc.subjectinfluencer marketingen_US
dc.subjectinfluencer relationsen_US
dc.subjectword of mouth marketingen_US
dc.subjecteWOMen_US
dc.subjectorganic eWOMen_US
dc.subjectpaid eWOMen_US
dc.subjectPESO modelen_US
dc.subjectdigital word of mouth marketingen_US
dc.subjecteWOMMen_US
dc.subjectattention economyen_US
dc.subjectdigital reputation economyen_US
dc.subjectonline communitiesen_US
dc.subjectvirtual communitiesen_US
dc.subjectonline advertisingen_US
dc.subjectonline advertising avoidanceen_US
dc.subjectonline advertising measurementen_US
dc.subjectrelationship marketingen_US
dc.subjectpeer-to-peer marketingen_US
dc.subjectecology of advertising rolesen_US
dc.subjectanchor contenten_US
dc.subjectfiller contenten_US
dc.subjectcontent creator(s)en_US
dc.subjectmicrocelebritiesen_US
dc.subjectclick thru rateen_US
dc.subjectFacebooken_US
dc.subjectTwitteren_US
dc.subjectInstagramen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.subjectSnapchaten_US
dc.subjectbusiness logicen_US
dc.subjectscience logicen_US
dc.subjectartistic logicen_US
dc.subjecttechnical logicen_US
dc.subjectinfluencer logicen_US
dc.subject12 phases of effective influencer relationsen_US
dc.subjectcollaborative diplomatic attitudeen_US
dc.subjectexceptional communication skillsen_US
dc.subjectdeeply digital literateen_US
dc.subjectJIM disclosure approval continuumen_US
dc.titleInfluencer logic: How influencer relations worksen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Master of Communications Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gallagher_Shannon_2019_MCM.pdf
Open Access
2.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue