Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31573
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Lovric, Miroslav | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tretiakova, Kateryna | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T13:49:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-29T13:49:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-06-19 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31573 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Integrating mathematical reasoning and communication is essential for mastering and advancing mathematical learning, yet these competencies often develop along parallel tracks rather than in concert. This thesis investigates how students themselves perceive the link between reasoning and communication by studying three cohorts: first-year undergraduates in an introduction to mathematical reasoning course, upper-level mathematics majors, and high school competitors in math contests. Using surveys, semi-structured interviews, and a discussion-based “talking circle,” it examines students’ baseline communication skills, tracks their growth over a semester of formal reasoning instruction, and explores the role of proof-writing and collaborative problem solving in deepening their reasoning. Findings reveal that, although nearly all participants recognize the importance of clear justification for their academic and professional futures, they seldom connect reasoning with communication until advanced coursework or competitive settings explicitly foreground the act of explaining and defending ideas. Introductory students gained confidence in constructing formal proofs but continued to struggle with audience-appropriate articulation; upper-level majors demonstrated precision in argumentation yet found it challenging to translate technical proofs for non-specialists; and high-school competitors excelled at adapting explanations under time pressure and in team contexts. These results underscore that standard curricula alone do not guarantee integrated skill development. Deliberate pedagogical strategies -- such as structured peer-explanation exercises, scaffolded analogical reasoning tasks, and sustained discussion opportunities -- are needed to cultivate students who are not only proficient problem solvers but also articulate mathematical communicators prepared for advanced STEM study and engaged citizenship. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Mathematics Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Skill Development | en_US |
dc.subject | Mathematics Reasoning | en_US |
dc.subject | Mathematics Communication | en_US |
dc.subject | Mathematics Competitions | en_US |
dc.subject | Problem Solving | en_US |
dc.subject | Proof-Writing | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-Concept | en_US |
dc.title | Mathematical Reasoning and Communication: Analyzing Skills Development in University Students and High-Level Math Competitors | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Mathematics and Statistics | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science (MSc) | en_US |
dc.description.layabstract | Mathematics is often reduced to memorizing formulas and following procedures, yet true proficiency also demands the ability to reason through novel problems and explain ideas clearly. This thesis explores how students themselves perceive the link between mathematical reasoning (MR) and communication by gathering survey responses, interview insights, and discussion-activity reflections from both high school math competitors and McMaster University undergraduates. It examines their initial communication skills in mathematics, investigates whether participation in a formal MR course strengthens their ability to articulate and justify solutions, and considers if regular engagement in proof-writing and peer-explanation activities fosters deeper reasoning. Although most participants appreciate the importance of reasoning and clear expression for future success, they typically fail to connect these competencies until advanced coursework or extracurricular contexts make justification and collaboration explicit. These findings imply that, despite Canadian curricula aiming to develop both MR and communicative competence, standard instruction does not automatically integrate them, calling for more purposeful teaching strategies and further work to directly assess students’ reasoning and communication abilities. | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tretiakova_Kateryna_202504_MSc.pdf.pdf | 2.75 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.