Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Engineering
  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering
  5. Mechanical Engineering Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/31231
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim J-
dc.contributor.authorWilkerson SA-
dc.contributor.authorGadsden SA-
dc.contributor.editorKarlsen RE-
dc.contributor.editorGage DW-
dc.contributor.editorShoemaker CM-
dc.contributor.editorGerhart GR-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-27T20:16:27Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-27T20:16:27Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-13-
dc.identifier.issn0277-786X-
dc.identifier.issn1996-756X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/31231-
dc.description.abstractMany mechanical and electrical systems have utilized the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control strategy. The concept of PID control is a classical approach but it is easy to implement and yields a very good tracking performance. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are currently experiencing a significant growth in popularity. Due to the advantages of PID controllers, UAVs are implementing PID controllers for improved stability and performance. An important consideration for the system is the selection of PID gain values in order to achieve a safe flight and successful mission. There are a number of different algorithms that can be used for real-time tuning of gains. This paper presents two algorithms for gain tuning, and are based on the method of steepest descent and Newton's minimization of an objective function. This paper compares the results of applying these two gain tuning algorithms in conjunction with a PD controller on a quadrotor system.-
dc.publisherSPIE, the international society for optics and photonics-
dc.subject40 Engineering-
dc.subject4006 Communications Engineering-
dc.subject4009 Electronics, Sensors and Digital Hardware-
dc.subject51 Physical Sciences-
dc.subject5102 Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics-
dc.titleComparison of gradient methods for gain tuning of a PD controller applied on a quadrotor system-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.date.updated2025-02-27T20:16:26Z-
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineering-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.2223329-
Appears in Collections:Mechanical Engineering Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
045-gadsden_conf_045.pdf
Open Access
Published version1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue