Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Student Publications (Not Graduate Theses)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30902
Title: Prescribing strength training for stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors: Noguchi, Kenneth S
Moncion, Kevin
Wiley, Elise
Morgan, Ashley
Huynh, Eric
Balbim, Guilherme M
Elliott, Brad
Harris-Blake, Carlene
Krysa, Brent
Koetsier, Barb
Pinili, Karolyn
Beauchamp, Marla K
Phillips, Stuart M
Thabane, Lehana
Tang, Ada
Department: Rehabilitation Science
Keywords: Exercise Therapy;Meta-analysis;Neurological rehabilitation
Publication Date: 2024
Publisher: BMJ
Citation: Noguchi KS, Moncion K, Wiley E, Morgan A, Huynh E, Balbim GM, Elliott B, Harris-Blake C, Krysa B, Koetsier B, Pinili K, Beauchamp MK, Phillips SM, Thabane L, Tang A. Prescribing strength training for stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 15:bjsports-2024-108476. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108476. Epub ahead of print. PMID 39406459.
Abstract: Objective: To examine the effects of strength training on patient-important outcomes of stroke recovery and to quantify the influence of the exercise prescription on treatment effects. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) and two clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched from inception to 19 June 2024. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials were eligible if they examined the effects of strength training compared with no exercise or usual care and reported at least one exercise prescription parameter. An advisory group of community members with lived experience of stroke helped inform outcomes most relevant to stroke recovery. Results: Forty-two randomised trials (N=2204) were included. Overall risk of bias was high across most outcomes. Strength training improved outcomes rated as 'critical for decision-making' by the advisory group, including walking capacity (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.95 (95% CI 0.34-1.56)), balance (SMD=1.13 (0.51-1.75)), functional ability and mobility (SMD=0.61 (0.09-1.14)), and habitual (mean difference (MD)=0.05 m/s (0.02-0.09)) and fast-paced walking speed (MD=0.09 m/s (0.01-0.17)), with very low to moderate certainty of evidence, mainly due to risk of bias and inconsistency. More frequent strength training, traditional strength training programmes and power-focused intensities (ie, emphasis on movement velocity) were positively associated with walking capacity, health-related quality of life and fast-paced walking speed. Conclusion: Strength training alone or combined with usual care improves stroke recovery outcomes that are important for decision-making. More frequent strength training, power-focused intensities and traditional programme designs may best support stroke recovery.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30902
Identifier: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108476
Appears in Collections:Student Publications (Not Graduate Theses)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Noguchi et al 2024_Br J Sports Med_MACSPHERE.pdf
Open Access
429.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue