Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Science
  4. Department of Biology
  5. Biology Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30803
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAngeler DG-
dc.contributor.authorChow‐Fraser P-
dc.contributor.authorHanson MA-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez‐Carrillo S-
dc.contributor.authorZimmer KD-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-11T20:03:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-11T20:03:07Z-
dc.date.issued2003-12-
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2427-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30803-
dc.description.abstract1. Natural wetlands have traditionally been considered as efficient 'ecological engineers' for waste water treatment. However, the structure and function of many natural wetlands have been severely altered by the chronic exposure to pollutants, especially nutrients. 2. Despite the similarity of symptoms of eutrophied shallow lakes and wetlands, restoration strategies differ distinctly between these rather similar aquatic systems. Many of the tools applied in shallow lake restoration programs, for example biomanipulation, have received little attention in wetland management and restoration. 3. Although a strong conceptual basis for food web management exists, biotic interactions as influences on wetland communities have been largely neglected by wetland scientists and managers. 4. In this paper we show that biomanipulation may have a strong potential for wetland eutrophication abatement. This potential will be demonstrated by reviewing studies carried out in different wetland types in contrasting climatic regions. 5. We propose four different scenarios for when, where and why biomanipulation may be used to rehabilitate freshwater wetlands. These scenarios reflect different settings of hydrological variability, eutrophication sources and gradients of wind exposure and water colour.-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.subject4102 Ecological Applications-
dc.subject41 Environmental Sciences-
dc.subject6 Clean Water and Sanitation-
dc.titleBiomanipulation: a useful tool for freshwater wetland mitigation?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.date.updated2025-01-11T20:03:07Z-
dc.contributor.departmentBiology-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01156.x-
Appears in Collections:Biology Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Angeler et al. 2003.pdf
Open Access
147.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue