Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Research Centres and Institutes
  3. Program for Interprofessional Practice, Education and Research (PIPER)
  4. Past conferences
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30236
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuach, Shirley-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorBrewer-Deluce, Danielle-
dc.contributor.authorWojkowski, Sarah-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T20:02:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T20:02:32Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30236-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Interprofessional education (IPE) is crucial in preparing health professional students for future interprofessional collaborations, shown to improve patient outcomes and safety. However, traditional IPE delivery transitioned into online and hybrid options during the pandemic. Purpose: To compare interprofessional collaboration readiness from program entry to graduation in entry-level, Master of Science physiotherapy (PT) students, during the pandemic years. Method: Two cohorts were included for this report: PT students enrolled from 2019 to 2021 and 2020 to 2022 which both experienced pandemic-related classroom disruptions. Students were invited to complete the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) at program entry and completion. Changes to RIPLS scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Somer’s D (D) for effect sizes. STATA 17.0 B/E was used for data analysis and p-values <0.05 were statistically significant. Results: A total of 47 students responded (mean age (SD) of 24.62 (0.79) years;26 (55%) females). There were statistically significant changes in PT students’ RIPLS scores between program entry and completion. Total RIPLS scores increased from 71 to 79 (p<0.001, D=0.35). Two subscales also improved: teamwork and collaboration (36 to 40; p<0.001, D=0.55), and positive professional identity (14 to 16; p<0.001, D=0.68). Conclusions: Across two cohorts, PT students’ improved RIPLS total and two subscale scores improved, demonstrating overall improved IPE readiness and attitudes for interprofessional collaboration, even when experiencing pandemic disruptions. Implications: IPE is a crucial program opportunity: it fosters positive attitudes toward collaborative practices, facilitating high quality, patient-centered care. From this report, the IPE curriculum in the PT program yielded improved IPE readiness, demonstrating that a non-conventional approach to IPE is still impactful, a potential carry-forward benefit from this situational solution to increase flexibility and engagement from students.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy educationen_US
dc.subjectInterprofessional educationen_US
dc.subjectIPEen_US
dc.subjectinterprofessional learningen_US
dc.subjectprogram evaluationen_US
dc.titlePhysiotherapy students’ attitudes toward interprofessional education at program entry and completion: a three-year cohorten_US
dc.typePosteren_US
Appears in Collections:Past conferences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Can PTA Poster CPA - Final 2024.pdf
Open Access
373.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue