Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29933
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKeir, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorMajoni, Nigel-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-09T18:39:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-09T18:39:27Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/29933-
dc.description.abstractHand and finger movements are underrepresented in biomechanical studies, primarily due to the challenge of tracking the hands and fingers. Several limitations are associated with marker-based motion capture, including interference with natural movement, and require the tedious, time-consuming application of numerous markers. Advancements in computer vision have led to the development of markerless motion capture systems yet validation of markerless systems for the upper extremities is limited, especially the hand and fingers. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess a markerless motion capture system capable of tracking hand and finger kinematics. A markerless system using four synchronized webcams was developed. Camera pairs were organized in different angles Centre90° (C/90°), Left45°/Right45° (L45°/R45°), and Centre/Left45° (C/L45°). Motion capture was performed with both marker-based and markerless systems. Twenty healthy participants performed five dynamic hand tasks with and without markers. Three-dimensional joint positions were defined using a musculoskeletal model in OpenSim. No significant differences were observed between C/90° and C/L45° markerless camera pairs and the marker-based system. The L45°/R45° camera pair differed significantly from other markerless pairs in several tasks but agreed with the marker-based system for the index finger during flexion. For most of the fingers, no significant differences were found across the different camera pairs. Correlations and error for the concurrent finger flexion task revealed high consistency among all the camera pairs, with R² above 0.90 and RMSD below 10°, the thumb showed greater variability. The R² and RMSD varied depending on the camera comparison and finger for each task. Markerless motion capture for the hands and fingers is possible with little difference to marker-based systems and is dependent on the camera orientation used.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMarkerless motion captureen_US
dc.subjectFinger Kinematicsen_US
dc.subjectMediapipe Handsen_US
dc.subjectComputer Visionen_US
dc.titleMarkerless motion capture for the hands and fingersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Kinesiologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Majoni_Tawanda_N_202407_M.Sc.pdf
Open Access
2.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue