Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29690
Title: | Exploring the Socio-Ecological Influences on Family Physicians' and Residents' Commitment to Rural Maternity Care: A Scoping Review |
Other Titles: | Influencing Factors on Rural Maternity Care Practice |
Authors: | Tansey, Isabel |
Advisor: | McNiven, Patricia |
Department: | Global Health |
Keywords: | Family Physician;Rural Maternity Care;Family Medicine;Obstetrics |
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Abstract: | Background: Rural maternity care in Canada is in crisis, with many communities losing local services. This forces rural women and families to travel for care, leading to heightened stress, expenses, and adverse outcomes. Family physicians, often the primary providers of rural maternity care, are decreasing in numbers, exacerbating the problem. Without enough providers, rural communities struggle to offer safe and accessible maternity services, risking the health of expectant mothers and families. Objective: This research aims to gain a comprehensive understanding of the socio-ecological influences that shape the commitment of family physicians and residents to practice rural maternity care. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, and database searching occurred in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare, and Web of Science. Primary studies and literature reviews in English were included if they discussed family physicians' and residents' experiences and perspectives in practicing and training for rural maternity care. Articles were restricted to the past 30 years. Thematic analysis was applied to analyze the data, and results were reported in tabular format. Results: Influencing factors were categorized into themes and contextualized across the socio-ecological model: 1) individual factors (i.e. interests, attitudes, motivation, burnout, risk), 2) interpersonal factors (i.e. lifestyle, interprofessional relationships, mentors), 3) organizational factors (i.e. training and professional development, work environment and practice characteristics, resources, regulation and privileging), 4) community-level factors (i.e. practice setting and location, job availability, community context), and 5) systematic factors (healthcare system structure, public policy, legal and regulatory framework). Conclusion: The most salient influencing factors included challenges with Family Medicine residency training and role models, call schedule sustainability and interprofessional collaboration, as well as preserving clinical skills and financial stability with low procedural volume in rural communities. There is a need to implement evidence-based interventions targeting training, recruiting role models, interprofessional collaboration and call, and effective rural remuneration. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29690 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tansey_Isabel_A_202404_MSc.pdf | 674.2 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.