Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29327
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGoldreich, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorJajarmi, Rose-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T16:01:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-05T16:01:06Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/29327-
dc.description.abstractWhen examining objects using tactile senses, individuals often incorporate multiple sources of haptic sensory information to estimate the object’s properties. How do our brains integrate various cues to form a single percept of the object? Previous research has indicated that integration from cues across sensory modalities is optimally achieved by weighting each cue according to its variance, such that more reliable cues have more weight in determining the percept. To explore this question in the context of a within-modality haptic setting, we assessed participants’ perception of edges that cross the index, middle, and ring fingers of the right hand. We used a 2-interval forced choice (2IFC) task to measure the acuity of each digit individually, as well as the acuity of all three digits working together, by asking participants to distinguish the locations of two closely spaced plastic edges. In examining the data, we considered three perceptual models, an optimal (Bayesian) model, an unweighted average model, and a winner-take-all model. The results indicate that participants perceived sub-optimally, such that the acuity of the three digits together did not exceed that of the best individual digit. We further investigated our question by having participants unknowingly undergo a 2IFC cue conflict condition, where they thought they were touching a straight edge which was actually staggered and thus gave each digit a different positional cue. Our analyses indicate that participants did not undertake optimal cue combination but are inconclusive with respect to which suboptimal strategy they employed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBayesian inferenceen_US
dc.subjectsensory integrationen_US
dc.subjectpsychophysicsen_US
dc.subjecttactile perceptionen_US
dc.subjectoptimal cue integrationen_US
dc.subjectcue conflicten_US
dc.subjectperceptionen_US
dc.subjectBayesian modellingen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of Multi-Digit Tactile Integrationen_US
dc.title.alternativeInvestigation of Multi-Digit Tactile Integration: Evidence for Sub-Optimal Human Performanceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThis thesis investigates the neural mechanisms behind tactile perception, specifically how the brain combines multiple sensory cues to construct a unified percept when interacting with objects through touch. Typically, optimal sensory integration involves assigning more weight to more reliable cues. Our research focused on tactile integration by examining participants’ ability to perceive the positions of edges crossing their index, middle, and ring fingers simultaneously. The results indicated that, contrary to predictions, participants exhibited various sub-optimal cue integration strategies. Their ability to perceive the combined positions of all three fingers was not superior to that of the best-performing individual finger. We also explored cue conflict situations, where the locations of the tactile cues were no longer from a straight edge, unbeknown to participants, and the results here reinforced the finding that participants did not consistently employ optimal cue combination strategies. This research offers valuable insights into how the brain processes tactile information.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jajarmi_Rose_202312_MSc.pdf
Open Access
4.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue