Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/28850
Title: The Use of Indirect Calorimetry for Nutrition Assessments in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Gastrointestinal Conditions
Authors: Fardowsa, Abdi
Advisor: Pinto-Sanchez, Maria Ines
Department: Medical Sciences
Publication Date: 2023
Abstract: Resting energy expenditure (REE) is challenging to predict in chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal conditions (CIGI) such as celiac disease (CeD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In clinical practice, predictive equations (PE) are often used to provide estimates of REE. However, indirect calorimetry is a gold-standard method for accurate measurement of energy needs. The central hypothesis for this study was that there would be differences in predicted and measured energy needs in CIGI. We conducted a prospective observational study at an outpatient clinic where REE (kcal/day) was measured by the Q-NRG® Metabolic Cart. This was compared with REE estimated by five commonly used PE (25 kcal/kg, Harris-Benedict, Schofield, Mifflin-St. Jeor and Owen) using paired t-tests (IBM SPSS Version 29.0). REE (kcal/day) and REE adjusted for weight (REE/kcal/kg) were compared in different GI groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. The study population comprised eighty-seven patients with CIGI (CeD [n=61], IBD [n=10], and Other [n=16]). Mean REE (1462 ± 281) was significantly lower compared with several PE: 1) 25 kcal/kg (1933 ± 536; p <0.001); 2) Harris-Benedict (1552 ± 287; p<0.001); 3) Schofield (1522 ± 282, p=0.01), while higher than Owen (1411 ± 228, p=0.02) and similar to Mifflin St. Jeor (1450 ± 277; p=0.56). REE adjusted for weight (kcal/kg/day) was significantly higher in IBD as compared with CeD patients (22.9 vs 18.2; p=0.04), potentially due to differences in disease activity (16% CeD with active disease vs. 60% IBD with active disease; p=0.0022). Furthermore, fat-free mass (FFM) (r=0.70, p<0.001), BMI (r=0.47, p<0.01), and protein intake (r=0.24, p=0.02) were important predictors of REE in this cohort. The present results suggest that basal caloric needs are inaccurately predicted by PE, which may have significant implications in the long-term nutritional management of CeD and IBD.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/28850
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abdi_Fardowsa_A_20230810_MedicalSciences_MSc.pdf
Open Access
3.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue