Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27770
Title: | Listening in Noise and Divided Attention |
Other Titles: | Combining Listening in Noise and Divided Attention with Pupillary Response to Explore Attentional Resource Use |
Authors: | Cerisano, Stefania |
Advisor: | Milliken, Bruce |
Department: | Psychology |
Keywords: | Attention;Listening in Noise;Divided Attention;Attention Allocation;Pupil Dilation;Cognitive Effort |
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Abstract: | The concept of attention is complex and multifaceted and can be approached from many perspectives. One such perspective is of attention as a limited pool of resources. Kahneman’s (1973) model of limited capacity provides a basis for understanding constraints on attention, including the costs of divided attention. In the same vein as Kahneman’s model, the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL; Pichora-Fuller et al., 2016) applies the concept of limited attentional capacity to the demands of listening in a variety of contexts. The current work examines novel combinations of the methods commonly used in the field of Cognitive Hearing Science to address questions about the nature of attention allocation when listening in noise and under the constraints of divided attention. I first combined listening in noise with a secondary continuous working memory task and measured pupillary response as an index of cognitive work and listening effort. Here, I found that listening task demands affect performance on the working memory task. The shared demands of listening and working memory were not, however, evident in the pupil dilation patterns. As a result, I followed these findings by employing a different divided attention method. With the use of a temporally discrete secondary task that either closely overlapped with the listening task or did not closely overlap, I found the same carryover effects of listening demands on secondary task. Most importantly, I found that these demands interacted and were clearly present in the pupil dilation patterns, demonstrating the importance of the timing of the task demands. Together, the studies in this thesis provide evidence that these two secondary tasks access the same attentional resources as those accessed in the primary listening task and that this overlapping demand for resources can be seen in the pupillary response. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27770 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cerisano_Stefania_2022August_PhD.pdf | 2.19 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.