Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27461
Title: | The Development of Employment Protection Legislation in the United Kingdom (1963-2018) and Sweden (1971-2020) |
Authors: | Ferdosi, Mohammad |
Advisor: | McBride, Stephen |
Department: | Political Science |
Keywords: | United Kingdom;Sweden;collective laissez-faire;employers’ associations;trade union organizations;collective bargaining;crisis;parliamentary democracy;political parties;policy actors;individual employment law;employment protection legislation;notice of termination;redundancy payments;unfair dismissal protection;job reinstatement;allowance of fixed-term contracts;institutional power resources;labour courts;European Union Commission;enforcement gap;labour market insiders and outsiders;deregulation |
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Abstract: | Several interesting findings emerged from this study. First, strong labour movements still failed to successfully bargain for employment protections due to resistance from employers to encroachments on their institutionalized managerial prerogatives. Second, governments favoured a policy of abstentionism and acquiescence to the collective-laissez-faire tradition until the critical juncture of the 1960s and 1970s. Third, the increasing power resources of trade unions and a deteriorating socio-economic climate created a window of opportunity for bold government action to improve industrial relations, albeit without the consent of employers, and at first, unions. Fourth, contrary to the liberalizing pressures one would expect to find in an archetypical free market economy, the UK has implemented far more statutory protections than deregulatory reforms. Fifth, in contrast to its traditional non-intervention in industrial relations and reputation for worker-protective regulations, Swedish governments have enacted numerous statutes, both restricting and freeing managerial prerogatives in the hiring and firing process. Sixth, statutory employment protections became an independent set of institutional power resources for unions in the long run, serving their organizational and representational interests in important ways. Seventh, unions and left parties consistently defended and advanced the policy preferences of their core constituencies in secure employment by privileging the job security of regular contracts. Eighth, employers and parties on the right of the political spectrum consistently opposed restrictions on the managerial capacity to hire and fire at will, especially for small businesses. Nineth, to increase flexibility without threatening the stability of regular contracts, reforms over the years had to foster atypical forms of work, creating a regulatory gap between permanent and temporary employment, particularly in Sweden. Tenth, differences exist between job security in the statute books and job security in action, particularly in the UK where this gap pervades all aspects of the unfair dismissal system. These findings suggest employment protection legislation has developed in ways far more complex, dynamic and contradictory than is commonly assumed by prominent theories of comparative political economy. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27461 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ferdosi_Mohammad_finalsubmission2022March_PhD.pdf | 1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.