Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/24979
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBock, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorYoganathan, Laagishan-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T13:59:06Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-07T13:59:06Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24979-
dc.description.abstractMulti-site MRI studies collect large amounts of data in a short time frame. Large sample sizes are desirable to address power and replicability issues that have been problematic for scientists in the past. Although multi-site MRI solves the sample size problem, it brings with it a new set of challenges. Scanning the same person at different sites might result in differences in MRI derived measurements. In this thesis we compared three approaches to facilitate the analysis of multi-site MRI data: quantitative R1 mapping, adding site as a covariate in a linear model, and using the ComBat method. We also investigated the relationship between two common MRI measurements: signal and volume. We collected data from 64 healthy participants across 3 GE scanners and 1 Siemens scanner at 3T. We found that signal intensity was different between vendors whereas volume was not. Our R1 method resulted in values that were different across vendor and significantly lower than those reported in the literature. B1+ maps used to calculate R1 were different across sites. Using a scale factor, we were able to compensate for mistakes in R1 mapping. We also found that adding site as a covariate corrected mean differences in signal intensity across sites, but not differences in variance. The ComBat method gave best similarity between sites. However, since different people were scanned at each site, we couldn’t evaluate the effectiveness of each method as variation in the data could have been due to site effects or heterogeneity in participants. White matter volume and signal intensity in the white matter were correlated in males but not in females. We found that this low correlation was caused by outliers in our female sample. The correlation between white matter volume and signal in males suggests that both metrics are measuring myelin and can be used as converging evidence to detect changes in brain myelination.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectMyelinen_US
dc.subjectWhite Matteren_US
dc.subjectR1en_US
dc.subjectT1en_US
dc.subjectFreeSurferen_US
dc.subjectHuman Connectome Projecten_US
dc.subjectVolumeen_US
dc.subjectAge Trajectoryen_US
dc.subjectStructural MRIen_US
dc.subjectT1 weighteden_US
dc.subjectIntracortical Myelinen_US
dc.subjectSurface Spaceen_US
dc.titleMulti-Site Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myelinen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
yoganathan_laagishan_sept2019_msc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2020-09-26
2.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue