Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20539
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorQuenneville, Cheryl E.-
dc.contributor.authorChakravarty, Avery B.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-27T13:55:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-27T13:55:53Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/20539-
dc.description.abstractThe tibia is a frequent site of injury in frontal automotive collisions. The bulk of experimental cadaveric studies on injury tolerance assume load is applied in line with the leg’s long axis, leaving non-standard postures largely uninvestigated. The purpose of this work was to study the effects of non-standard postures on the tibia’s injury tolerance. A pneumatic system was designed to facilitate impact testing. This system allows the user to fire a projectile of variable mass towards a specimen at a range of velocities by varying the supplied air pressure. Impact tests were performed using pairs of isolated cadaveric tibias. Within each pair of specimens, two postures were compared by varying the angle of the bone’s long axis relative to the direction of impact, representing knee extension and corresponding plantarflexion. It was found that the specimens held further from the axial posture sustained injury at lower forces. Two commonly-used Anthropomorphic Test Device legforms were impacted in these non-standard postures. New load limits were proposed for the use of these devices in off-axis impact testing. In order to compare directly with the loads measured by the legforms, it was necessary to measure forces and moments internal to the bone’s long axis. A non-invasive load estimation method was developed and tested using strain measured from the surface of four specimens. The method performed poorly under impact conditions, but may be refined in the future. Quantifying the effect of posture on injury risk in the tibia allows for the refinement of existing injury criteria. Ultimately, this can be used to enhance the design of protective devices to reduce the incidence of tibia fractures in automotive collisions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectboneen_US
dc.subjectimpact loadingen_US
dc.subjectautomotive collisionen_US
dc.subjectpostureen_US
dc.subjecttibiaen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Off-Axis Loading on Fracture Risk in the Human Tibiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Applied Science (MASc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractFractures of the tibia (the shin bone) are common in automotive collisions, and often lead to long-term impairment. Experimental studies on these kinds of injuries are usually performed with the lower leg aligned with the direction of impact, which does not reflect the range of postures an occupant may assume during a crash. Cadaveric tibias were subjected to impact loading in two different postures. It was found that the specimens held further from an axial posture sustained fractures at lower forces. Two commonly-used crash test dummy legs were also impacted in these non-standard postures to test their performance. Suggestions were made for new load limits to be used with these devices in non-standard postures. The finding that leg posture has an effect on injury risk in the tibia can be used in the future to design and evaluate better protective devices and ultimately reduce the incidence of these injuries.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chakravarty_Avery_B_2016September_MASc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2017-09-23
3.61 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue