Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19710
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Beier, J. Marshall | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wegner, Nicole | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-30T16:11:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-30T16:11:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19710 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation examines narratives given by elite foreign policy voices during the Canadian Forces’ involvement in the 2001–2014 International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission(s) in Afghanistan. Part I introduces the topic and outlines the theoretical and methodological ap- proaches used. Part II explores three dominant narratives presented by foreign policy elites: (a) Canada was in Afghanistan to support our NATO allies and to avoid dam- aging our international reputation; (b) Canada was in Afghanistan to fight terrorism and promote security abroad to reduce the domestic threat of terrorism to Canada’s borders; and (c) Canada was in Afghanistan to assist with humanitarian projects to help Afghans. I explore these narratives in light of a long-standing identity myth about Canada’s role in international politics: Canada-as-Peacekeeper. I examine attempts by foreign policy elites to use the mission in Afghanistan to re-militarize Canadian foreign policy and shed the peacekeeper myth. Part III demonstrates that official war discourses are a result of political negotiations and hegemonic power. Using the Support the Troops campaign, I demonstrate that critics of policy in Afghanistan were silenced using pro-military rhetoric. I argue that the control of foreign policy narratives and the de-politicization of the military as political agents have many problematic effects, most notably that military violence is often cast as an appropriate solution for global political problems. I argue that preoccupation with Canada’s place in the world (i.e. Canada’s international identity) in foreign policy scholarship has under-theorized how narratives about Canadian foreign policy distort and omit particular perspectives. Official discourse on Afghanistan was highly euphemized and politically strategic. The mythologized belief that Canada is a middle-power “helpful-fixer” obscures the actual violence that occurs within military interventions and omits the burden of trauma experienced by soldiers and foreign bodies. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Militarization | en_US |
dc.title | Inter-National Imag(ining): Canada's Military in Afghanistan | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Political Science - International Relations | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Dissertation | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wegner_Nicole_L_FinalSubmission2016June_PhD.pdf | 13.78 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.