Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. DeGroote School of Business
  4. DeGroote School of Business Working Papers
  5. Michael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies Working Paper Series
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19079
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJin, Justin-
dc.contributor.authorKanagaretnam, Kiridaran-
dc.contributor.authorLobo, Gerald J.-
dc.contributor.authorMichael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-08T16:52:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-08T16:52:20Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/19079-
dc.description.abstractWe study whether bank managers’ use their discretion in estimating the allowance for loan losses (ALL) for efficiency or for opportunistic reasons. We do so by examining whether the use of this discretion relates to bank stability and bank risk taking, or whether it relates to earnings management to meet or beat earnings benchmarks. We find that banks that had higher abnormal ALL during the period prior to the 2007-2009 financial crisis engaged in less risk taking during the pre-crisis period and had a lower probability of failure during the crisis period. In tests related to earnings management to meet or beat earnings benchmarks, we find that abnormal ALL is unrelated to next period’s loss avoidance and just meeting or beating the prior year’s earnings. Our results suggest that bank managers use their discretion over ALL for efficiency and not for opportunistic purposes. They inform policy makers and accounting standard setters on banks’ use of accounting discretion as a means to build a cushion against future credit losses as they transition from the incurred loss model to the expected loss model for loan loss accounting. Valuation Insight: Jin, Kanagaretnam, and Lobo study the allowance for loan losses by banks. Managers use discretion in determining loan loss allowances. More ‘abnormal’ allowances, rather than a signal that market values should decrease, preserve value by serving as a cushion against future shocks and, accordingly, decreased the probability of bank failures during the recent global financial crisis.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship32 p. ; Includes bibliographical references (pp. 23-25). ; "November 10, 2015." ; Jin thanks the DeGroote School of Business for its financial support. Jin, Kanagaretnam and Lobo thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) for its financial support.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMichael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies Working Paper ; 2015-12-
dc.subjectLoan loss allowanceen_US
dc.subjectRisk takingen_US
dc.subjectFinancial crisisen_US
dc.subjectEarnings managementen_US
dc.titleDiscretion in bank loan loss allowance, risk taking, and earnings managementen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNoneen_US
Appears in Collections:Michael Lee-Chin and Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies
Michael Lee-Chin & Family Institute for Strategic Business Studies Working Paper Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sbv_wp_2015-12.pdf
Open Access
137.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue